• humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Disturbing. Biden certainly kept the election interference operations going, and narco gang support. It’s hard to imagine a more overt operation than the bay of piglets. Would need to move air carrier battle group away from Israel. Bombing all the things would send immigrant caravans north.

    It’s same playbook as Ukraine. To destabilize enough to buy everything cheap. With Israel not directly benefitting, it would be a hard media/public sale for such obvious demonic imperialism.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    USA was a world stabilizer. 1 trump term and a quiet Biden follow up and we have Russia and Israel losing their damn minds. Even N Korea is marching.

    And why not? Who will stop them? China amassing around Thailand per a couple articles.

    Impulsive. With a “I do what I want.” slogan is the new USA example. The world will follow. The USA guardrails were only broken the first Trump term and only the boldest broke through. Now they’re completely off. Anything could happen.

    Between this and our internal rage regarding healthcare and money, I’m not feeling optimistic about the next few years.

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      55 minutes ago

      USA was a world stabilizer.

      Do you really, really believes that?

  • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The US military establishment is not so stupid as to get engaged in multiple simultaneous conflicts on multiple continents in multiple oceans

  • Grapho@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The Syria offensive has emboldened the warhawks, but they’re out of their fuckin minds if they think the rest of Latin America/Russia would just twiddle their thumbs as they do it.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The US can’t even prevent leftists getting elected in their own hemisphere anymore. The ME and north Africa are the only places its still having successes.

  • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Huge amounts of low quality websites being posted here now. I’ve never heard of Mint Press news so I looked them up -

    Detailed Report

    Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Pseudoscience, Poor Sources, Failed Fact Checks

    Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-9.1)

    Factual Reporting: LOW (7.8)

    Country: USA

    MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE

    Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

    MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

    Edit - ha ha didn’t realise it was .ml 😂

    I thought I blocked you spastics

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Critical thinking is too difficult, so its best to let zionist bloggers tell you what’s factual. /s

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      MBFC is the lowest quality website around: literally just some random right wing jerk offs opinion. Yet liberals treat it like unquestionable holey scripture because it confirms their bias

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      🤓☝️ uh ackchually my media aggregator website says your website is bad!

      If you want to be a redditor so bad go back to reddit

    • Samsuma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Here’s an exercise for you that may require critical thinking (which evidently, you seem very averse to): Can you list out things that are invalid, dishonest and/or blatantly false in the article? Ensure to quote the parts that fit this category of “invalid, dishonest and/or false” and justify why, while citing sources that you believe to not be in this category.