• Norgur@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        And the sheer amount of weird pseudo-reality-show-shovelware! Good grief, people! If you want made up content that’s supposed to look like the real thing, watch porn!

  • RampageDon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I just assumed the Netflix top 10 were movies/shows they were trying to push, not based on actual veiwership.

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t get why the streaming services would care what media people watch. Are they pushing stuff that is cheaper to license?

      • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They want to get recommendations just good enough to keep you hooked. If they show you just the objectively best, you would instantly know after seeing the best ones, that the rest of the catalogue is worse and worse.

        This is how Netflix was in the beginning. I actually unsubscribed for a while for yhis reason. Now I’m as hooked as ever, there might still be a few good ones out there - I just need to keep scrolling for a few hours. /s

  • oyo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Remember when Netflix had a million dollar competition to improve their recommendation system by something like 10%? Remember when they had user ratings and reviews? Remember when they threw it all in the fucking trash?

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The original recommendation engine was amazing. Showed me stuff I loved that I would have never found myself. My favorite example is the French claymation acid trip called “A Town Named Panic”

      Now all I get recommended are shows that are cancelled and that I’ve already watched.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I feel that way when I see YouTube shorts. Some of them are big titted girls doing shit which I can understand why those get clicked on but a lot of it I can’t even figure out what is supposed to be happening.

        • Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Right? Like it has its moments of good and bad. I mean it’s not an Oscar winner, but it wasn’t so bad that I lost interest.

          Tbh I thought JLo did a pretty good job.

          • CptEnder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Damn JLo was my main reason not to watch, historically she’s just not that great. But if she pulled it off or made it kinda self-aware I’ll check it out.

            65 is also really good.

            • Spaceinv8er@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Well it’s still JLo. If you aren’t much a fan you won’t be too impressed. Imo she can be fairly one directional in her movies.

              That said, when I watch a movie that has heavy CGI I try and take a step back throughout the movie from all the special effects and evaluate an actors performance.

              Ya ok sounds pretentious, but I try to imagine the environment they are in when acting. It’s basically nothing but a green box, with someone off to the side reading lines.

              If they can give a fairly believable performance I’m impressed, because we see all the special effects, editing, direction and production. The actor has to imagine it, and hope they don’t look like a dumbass in post.

              65 was alright. Wanted more dinosaurs though lol

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It keeps trying to get me to watch the new Zack Snyder Star Wars rip-off.

    I watched the first one. I’d take a prostate exam by Edward Scissorhands before I waste another two hours of my life on the sequel.

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Rebel Moon. Oh yeah, they’re so bad. And apparently a third one is on the way, and the extended cuts for all of them.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.” – Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

        “LOL just grab all that shit off the cutting room floor. Four hours sounds about right for a movie!” – Zack Snyder