• Freefall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Our trash-tier system only supports two parties. If you would normally vote blue (caring about others and being anti-genocide tells me you would be more left than right) and don’t do so this time, your lack of a blue vote means red needs one less to win. This functionally means you would be voting red. Your spoiler-vote protest would actually mean something in ranked-choice or other systems, but we don’t have that, so you are just voting red, but with more steps.

      I am all for any other candidate, to be fair, but the whole non-voting or spoiler-votingis a different thing entirely.

      • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This functionally means you would be voting red. Your spoiler-vote protest

        It’s not a protest vote. I want the Greens to win. And if everyone voted Green, then the Greens would win.

        Maybe you’re preventing the Greens from winning by voting Blue.

        • Freefall@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Ok, so it is just a spoiler vote. The greens don’t have a chance and never have. Sorry, it is still real world vs pipedream. This is where ranked choice would come in. People could vote green with blue as a second choice. When green inevitably loses, then your votes would go blue instead of red, like they will now.

          A full swap from blue to green by the entire party is a prisoners dilemma AT BEST.