The quote:

ā€œGiven Joe Bidenā€™s incredible record, given Donald Trumpā€™s terrible record: he should be mopping the floor with Donald Trump. Joe Biden is running against a criminal. It should not be even close. And there is only one reason it is close. And that is the presidentā€™s age.ā€

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    2 months ago

    The problem is that Republicans donā€™t vote for a candidate they vote for a party. The Republicans could run Hitlerā€™s reanimated corpse as their candidate and as long as it had that R next to its name it would get their vote. Democrats on the other hand are much more likely to not vote for or not even show up to vote at all for a candidate they donā€™t particularly like. Itā€™s why good Democrat candidates always beat Republican candidates of any kind, but bad candidates usually lose. Democrats massively outnumber Republicans, but the Democrat party nearly always runs the worst possible candidate. If Republicans win any election itā€™s not because they had a good candidate, itā€™s always because Democrats ran a bad one.

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      My pet theory is that the establishment wing of the party (that largely controls the DNC) wants to have a specific coalition that keeps them in power within the party. Like, if Democrats wanted to be the party of the working class or appeal to rural voters, they could but would require leadership that isnā€™t from New York, San Francisco, or other similarly rich places.

      So, under the leadership of Clinton, Pelosi, and Schumer, they chose to make the swing voters the ones they appeal to most. Maybe Bernieā€™s positive populism would have matched up better against Trumpā€™s negative populism than Clintonā€™s outdated neoliberalism. But leadership and the DNC would rather lose an election and keep control than win but lose their place atop the party hierarchy.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        Ā·
        2 months ago

        My pet theory is that the establishment wing of the party (that largely controls the DNC) wants to have a specific coalition that keeps them in power within the party. Like, if Democrats wanted to be the party of the working class or appeal to rural voters, they could but would require leadership that isnā€™t from New York, San Francisco, or other similarly rich places.

        I think itā€™s simultaneously less conspiratorial and more nefarious than that: the establishment wing of the party likes power and power means control over campaign funding, so they pander to large corporate donors by suppressing anti-corporate populists.