• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    219
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    >reboot to bootloader -> unlock -> you will use your warranty -> yes

    It’s fucking outrageous that companies are allowed to blatantly lie like that (you will not, in fact, lose your warranty – Federal law doesn’t allow it). Every company that displays such a fraudulent message ought to be fined by the FTC, or worse.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      5 days ago

      ought to be fined by the FTC, or worse

      Fines don’t work, just start throwing people in jail already.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        5 days ago

        By its nature, the only penalties that can be applied to a corporate entity are fines or revoking its charter. The latter is what I had in mind when I wrote “or worse,” although I suppose piercing the corporate veil and going after the company’s executives personally is certainly an option too!

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          It’s insane to respect corporations’ rights when we know very well how pointless they are for the public’s interests. We want proper behavior and serious punishments. We don’t want to respect corporate and their rights.

          • psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            We might also need voting records so we know which members of the board need to be punished for corporate action

            • Comment105@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              And it there’s been a failure to keep voting records, punish the whole board. Be more ruthless to these fucks.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          You can pierce the corporate veil. "What lawyer approved it? Who was responsible for putting that message there?”.

          The corporation might not be able to be punished, but the actual people who did the thing can be.

          The corporate veil for legal action only makes sense for a limited number of things that are problematic for the company but no person could really be expected to have directly made the choice.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 days ago

      OP seems to be Austrian. I don’t think the FTC has anything to say about Austrian laws.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      Good to know… Is this only related to software hacking? Or is the warning sticker on hardware also bullshit?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        5 days ago

        The warning sticker on hardware is also bullshit.

        The TL;DR of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is that if the manufacturer wants to deny your warranty claim, the burden is on them to prove that the owner’s “unreasonable use” (abuse), neglect of required maintenance, or modification of the product was the actual cause of the failure.

        For example, a car manufacturer can’t use the fact that you tinted the windows as an excuse to deny your claim for an engine failure, but they could deny it for your failure to perform oil changes.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 days ago

          Unfortunately the TOS you agreed to says a ridiculous “arbitration” will determine who’s right that you abused the equipment - and guess who the arbitrator will decide for.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 days ago

            Add it to the pile of reasons why, for products (as opposed to services), things like EULAs and ToS are unenforceable bunk.

    • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      The amount that companies lie about laws is just disgusting.

      Oftentimes most of the EULA isn’t even enforceable, but they put it there anyway. It really ought to be illegal to do that.