SeattleRain@lemmy.worldM to Housing Bubble 2: Return of the Ugly @lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoCalif. lawmaker wants to ban firms from owning over 1,000 homessfstandard.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkCalif. lawmaker wants to ban firms from owning over 1,000 homessfstandard.comSeattleRain@lemmy.worldM to Housing Bubble 2: Return of the Ugly @lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squareDonjuanme@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoI think there are places where you want to be able to house workers, and I’d rather have people living in residences than on company land. But I appreciate the sentiment, I think companies should be limited in their ability to charge people for living.
minus-squareZapBeebz_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoThen the company can build/buy high density housing. Single family homes should not be used as corporate investment vehicles. Ever.
I think there are places where you want to be able to house workers, and I’d rather have people living in residences than on company land.
But I appreciate the sentiment, I think companies should be limited in their ability to charge people for living.
Then the company can build/buy high density housing. Single family homes should not be used as corporate investment vehicles. Ever.