mozz@mbin.grits.dev to politics @lemmy.world · 29 days agoIt’s vitally important that Democrats now ask one question and one question only: Does Biden have the best chance of beating Trump, or is there someone else readily available who has a better chance?robertreich.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square321fedilinkarrow-up1416arrow-down179cross-posted to: antitrumpalliance@lemmy.worlduspolitics@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1337arrow-down1external-linkIt’s vitally important that Democrats now ask one question and one question only: Does Biden have the best chance of beating Trump, or is there someone else readily available who has a better chance?robertreich.substack.commozz@mbin.grits.dev to politics @lemmy.world · 29 days agomessage-square321fedilinkcross-posted to: antitrumpalliance@lemmy.worlduspolitics@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.world
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·29 days agoYes, I corrected someone’s factual inaccuracy. If you want to respond to things that other people are currently talking about, be my guest.
minus-squareOccamsTeapot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·29 days agoI was talking about the thing the person you responded to was talking about. Anyway, this was oddly hostile so I’m out.
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·29 days agoThen respond to them, not me.
minus-squareOccamsTeapot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·29 days agoI was responding to what you said about what they said. This is generally how conversations go
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·29 days agoYou didn’t respond to what I said though. You responded, yes, but it had nothing to do with what I said or the point I was making or responding to.
minus-squareOccamsTeapot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·29 days agoNever mind dude, there is a link, but I’ve already tried to explain it. You were correct in your comment, which I think is all you’re bothered about.
minus-squareBlackbeard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·29 days agoThat’s quite literally all I was trying to say, so yes.
Yes, I corrected someone’s factual inaccuracy. If you want to respond to things that other people are currently talking about, be my guest.
I was talking about the thing the person you responded to was talking about.
Anyway, this was oddly hostile so I’m out.
Then respond to them, not me.
I was responding to what you said about what they said. This is generally how conversations go
You didn’t respond to what I said though. You responded, yes, but it had nothing to do with what I said or the point I was making or responding to.
Never mind dude, there is a link, but I’ve already tried to explain it. You were correct in your comment, which I think is all you’re bothered about.
That’s quite literally all I was trying to say, so yes.