“They’re super comfortable”
I think that pose is called the swallow
Swallow, come!
No one disturb him, he’s been doing yoga for years preparing for this moment.
They are pretty cool pants.
Legit. I like how the texture looks like a function of the fabric, not a printed-on pattern. Plus the stitching looks solid.
i’d like curtains to match that carpet
“I could never reach.”
“Reach what?”
“You know…”
“What, your clit??”
“Yeah, it’s like you said, ‘everyone gets curious and tries it some time.’”
“I never tried it.”
" …"
" Fuckin’ pervert… "(I know that’s not the actual line, but the change fits the photo)
From the corner of my eye, I thought this was going to be a picture of The Deep.
Edit: spelling hehe
It is
Your I?
Oops. Fixed
Nanomachines?
being blocked by instagram because I don’t facebook is such a great co-mingling.
The joke is mysoginy
It’s not just women on social media though, that’s just a reflection of this OPs algorithm. A thirst trap is a thirst trap, don’t matter the gender.
“A thirst trap is a thirst trap, don’t matter the gender.” - Garbagebagel, 2024
Wiser words have never been spoken.
“DoN’T obJeCtiFy Us!”
Yeah, maybe don’t.
*objectifies self*
Don’t objectify me!
Yes, exactly. You’re getting there.
Cognitive dissonance must be respected.
Different women be saying different things.
Yeah it’s almost like they’re individuals. Who’da thunk it.
And some be saying exactly this while exposing themself like that. Did you think I was talking about all women?
Now say “but not all men” in a man-hater post! Double standards, yay!
Wat?
In my mind, it is significantly more likely that someone on the internet is a misogynist rather than them talking about the miniscule overlap between women not wanting to be objectified and women posing in manners that commonly get objectified. In the latter case, I would also expect that someone to be aware of the prevalence of misogynists and therefore distance themselves from them, so as to not be misunderstood. The downvotes you got seem to agree with me.
and “my prejudice is justified” but at the same time “not all women”.
Steadfast principles, I see.
Congratulations on technically not being wrong, I guess? I was admitting that, yeah, I made certain assumptions there. At the same time, I tried to provide you feedback that your communication attempt was evidently not successful. But rather than reflecting on that, you’re completely blocking that off. Rather than communicating, you’re just looking to prove that I’m a dumbass and you’re not. Was that first comment intentionally ambiguous, so you could prove you’re technically not wrong? Is that your thought of a good time? Because fucking hell, it is not for me.
This is my unfriendly account, where I don’t take the time to put breadcrumbs for people towards the path of realizing “all men are X but not all women are Y” is a double standard.
I don’t think you’re a dumbass. My comments were on your principles, not your intelligence.
Why do you think that is exposing? What is that exposing and why do you think that is a problem?
Why do you think that is exposing?
Because the dictionary does.
- to present to view; exhibit; display:
The storekeeper exposed his wares.
Next question
What is that exposing?
And some be saying exactly this while exposing themself like that.
Did you even read what I wrote? It’s really not that much.
why do you think that is a problem?
Where did I say it was a problem? Quote the exact part of my response where I say it’s a problem.
It was not clear.
Sure bro, because women share a hive mind.
Funny, I never said all women think like this, but somehow you did. Good projection
It’s impressive really. I thought men compartmentalized better, but here we see yet another internet stranger incapable of seperating something into “women choosing to” and “women choosing not to.”
