ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWhat sounds like a double standard but isn't?message-squaremessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up168arrow-down15
arrow-up163arrow-down1message-squareWhat sounds like a double standard but isn't?ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square72fedilink
minus-squareTedesche@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down11·2 days agoNo, that is a double-standard, it’s just a double-standard you’re arguing is justified.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down3·2 days agoThe definition of a double standard is that it’s unjust. At least, in common English.
minus-squareTedesche@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·2 days agoMmmmm…meta-injustice…(drool)
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down4·2 days agoit would be more of a double standard if the two groups were on equal footing, but they’re not.
No, that is a double-standard, it’s just a double-standard you’re arguing is justified.
The definition of a double standard is that it’s unjust. At least, in common English.
Mmmmm…meta-injustice…(drool)
it would be more of a double standard if the two groups were on equal footing, but they’re not.