Summary

Secretary of State Marco Rubio grew visibly frustrated during an ABC News interview when questioned about the Trump administration’s approach to Russia.

Defending Trump’s push for peace talks with Putin, Rubio insisted negotiations were necessary but admitted the administration didn’t know Russia’s demands.

He clashed with host George Stephanopoulos over Trump’s refusal to call Putin a dictator and the U.S. siding with Russia in a recent UN vote.

Rubio also compared Trump’s handling of Ukraine to Biden’s approach to Israel, further escalating tensions.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 minute ago

        Wouldn’t that be a dream… but it would only turn into finding the doctor that takes money for a clean test.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Or maybe we don’t vest so much power into a single psychotic ape. Maybe we have three presidents and they all have to agree before something happens, like the computers on the space shuttle

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I’m fine with that, as long as a sanity test gets written into the Constitution. I believe it should apply to all reps. But then if they change the definition of sanity… I don’t know what the best way forward is, but it’s surely not regression.

          • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Counterpoint: Fetterman.

            Dude had a stroke and stuck his tongue up Trump’s asshole. Even if they pass the sanity test they could have some kind of traumatic brain injury that makes them jerks.

            Plus I consider all humans to be psychotic apes who I wouldn’t trust as far as I can throw them. Including myself.

            • Maeve@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Fetterman was a plant. Someone posted an article about how he actually governed before he was a national level leader.

              Plus I consider all humans to be psychotic apes who I wouldn’t trust as far as I can throw them. Including myself.

              Fair point, and thanks for reminding me! The people who don’t want it are probably the people most capable and worthy. I look forward to your filing as a candidate! 😀

              Don’t hurt me please. I’m only half serious, but it’s exactly people with this attitude who should probably be on the ballot.

              • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                19 hours ago

                The people who don’t want it are probably the people most capable and worthy. I look forward to your filing as a candidate! 😀

                This comment made me realize I have a religious obligation to run for office. And then if I win to not do the job at all.

                The major problem, one of the major problems, for there are several, with governing people is that of who you get to do it. Or, rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them. To summarize: It is a well known and much lamented fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it.

                To summarize the summary: Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made president should on no account be allowed to do the job.

                To summarize the summary of the summary: people are a problem.

                • Douglas Adams
              • Tony Bark@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                17 hours ago

                There seemed to be quite a few who were just there to sabotage the party from within, such as Manchin.

                • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 hours ago

                  Manchin was the only Democrat who could win national office in West Virginia. He’s the best my sad state could do.

                  Yeah he tanked some important votes but a Republican replacement would have voted that way anyway. At least he stuck with the Democrats most of the time.

                  I don’t know that the excuse is for Kyrsten Sinema.