Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., has issued a dire warning to her party about the chaos that could ensue if they succeed in pushing President Joe Biden off the ticket. And she criticized Democrats whoā€™ve given off-the-record quotes that suggest the party has resigned itself to a second Trump term.

InĀ an Instagram Live video on Thursday, Ocasio-Cortez warned liberals that a brokered convention could lead to chaos, in part because she says some of the Democratic ā€œelitesā€ who want Biden outĀ alsoĀ donā€™t want Vice PresidentĀ Kamala HarrisĀ as the nominee in his place.

ā€œIf you think that is going to be an easy transition, Iā€™m here to tell you that a huge amount of the donor class and these elites who are pushing for the president not to be the nominee also do not want to see the VP be the nominee,ā€ she said.

Ocasio-Cortez claimed none of the people sheā€™s spoken with who are calling onĀ Biden to drop outĀ ā€” including lawmakers and legal experts ā€” have articulated a plan to swap out the nominee without minimizing the serious legal and procedural challenges that are likely to ensue.

Ocasio-Cortez also highlighted the racial, ethnic and class divisions that appear to have formed between the majority of thoseĀ pining to blow up the ticketĀ ā€” led mostly by white Democrats and media pundits ā€” and those elected officials who feel they and their constituents have too much at stake to upend the process at this point and so are willing to do the work to re-elect Biden-Harris. She alluded to this cultural divide in her video when she spoke out against anonymous sources expressing a sense of fatalism on behalf of Democrats about what might happen if Biden remains on the ticket:

What I will say is what upsets me is [Democrats] saying we will lose. For me, to a certain extent, I donā€™t care what name is on there. We are not losing. I donā€™t know about you, but my community does not have the option to lose. My community does not have the luxury of accepting loss in July of an election year. My people are the first ones deported. Theyā€™re the first ones put in Rikers. Theyā€™re the first ones whose families are killed by war.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    Ā·
    6 months ago

    I trust AOCs judgement, although it might just be both options are equal as long as the party can commit to one. The worst possible outcome is non-commitment, as itā€™s the worst of both worlds.

    Stick with Biden, you rally 100% with a flawed candidate and highlight all the good heā€™s done with a flawed Congress (a majority in name only on progressive issues). Can win if you donā€™t repeat 2016 mistakes, which at this point I donā€™t think weā€™ll be taking the rust belt for granted.

    Abandon Biden 100%, you quickly side with an obvious choice and build a campaign. Time isnā€™t on your side but you arenā€™t dealing with a much baggage. Can win if the big tent party can agree on things and rally behind the choice even if itā€™s not their first choice. Kamala is boring but probably would be the pick with least resistance.

    The problem is neither is happening, so you get Biden with sub-100% support and buying into the age narrative rather than pivoting to his strengths, which is very much a losing strategy. Those resigned to losing probably know this is our trajectory unless something big happens (e.g. Biden sheds the age narrative somehow or drops out leading to a clear successor.)

    My hope? We get a 2016 surprise in our favor: polls say Trump wins 99% odds yet Biden pulls off an upset. Wouldnā€™t that be sweet ironyā€¦

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      Ā·
      6 months ago

      My hope? We get a 2016 surprise in our favor: polls say Trump wins 99% odds yet Biden pulls off an upset. Wouldnā€™t that be sweet ironyā€¦

      The Trumpanzees are going to screech about the election being rigged regardless what happens, Iā€™d rather not give them any extra ammo for people to take them seriously about it. Iā€™d like to see Trump absolutely blown the fuck out with votes, I want a 98-2% split in favor of Biden. The only votes I want going toward Trump are Guilty votes from his jury.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        Ā·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, Iā€™d love a blowout but we know thatā€™s not going to happen. Let them whine, if they want to take up arms I just want to be on the side that still gets to control the drones.

        • qprimed@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          Ā·
          6 months ago

          if dems, indies, and the few remaining ā€œsane republicansā€. go out and vote, you will see a landslide. binden is not inspiring a groundswell. if the groundswell comes it will be due only to public terror. I would rather get a vote_based_on_terror + passing_of_the_torch_to_our_young_victims_cuz_we_sure_fucked_up vibe from the US population at large

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        Ā·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Itā€™ll be 98-2 in popular vote, but itā€™ll be 49-51 in electoral college.

    • Pronell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      6 months ago

      That situation wonā€™t happen as Trump would sue and the Supreme Court would agree there is fraud with no evidence to back it up.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        6 months ago

        I think thatā€™ll more likely be Congress, unless itā€™s as close as 2000 was. A margin like 2016 would be harder to override through courts, but if GOP gets both chambers I can see them just overriding the vote somehow, January 6 style.