• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I had a feeling you wouldn’t have an answer for what her messaging should be / what she should do instead.

    Honestly, like I say, I do sort of agree that it’s off-putting and misleading messaging, and that maybe it would be better to make some sort of attempt to communicate what’s actually going on and what the Democrats have been trying to do (since our media seems uninterested in doing that fairly important thing.) But, it is complex. Maybe it is right to just talk “border security”, lean into that, and if people get confused but still vote for her, then whatever it is fine.

    But yes it’s a bunch of shit to attack her with headlines that claim she said something she never said. IDK if she will make a genuine attempt to fix the border, but Biden did make that genuine attempt, and you attacked him with precisely the same messaging, so I think it’s fair to call this one bad faith also.

    (Edit: Also I see what you meant about “angry”; I went back in fixed it in my message)

    • return2ozma@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      I had a feeling you wouldn’t have an answer for what her messaging should be / what she should do instead.

      There’s nothing more she could say. This shithole country is too damn conservative already. The rest of the world is leaving us behind.