It’s still not earning you money to spend electricity because you still have to pay the transfer fee which is around 6 cents / kWh but it’s pretty damn cheap nevertheless, mostly because of the excess in wind energy.

Last winter because of a mistake it dropped down to negative 50 cents / kWh for few hours, averaging negative 20 cents for the entire day. People were literally earning money by spending electricity. Some were running electric heaters outside in the middle of the winter.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Depends on your definition of “feasible”.

    It is certainly within the capabilities of humanity to do it.

    It would cost far more, and have much higher ecological impact than alternatives.

    To me, that is not “feasible”.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s feasible and cost effective. The academic research on this has been quite clear, but it isn’t the sort of thing that generates headlines. Nuclear just isn’t necessary.