• ex10n@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Russia has lost 87% of its deployed troops by recent estimates, so fortunately it’s increasingly looking like the only way Russia can “win” is by saving face and removing their troops from occupied Ukrainian territories, including Crimea.

      • ex10n@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not sure why you’re citing a false statistic. Doesn’t really communicate much to me.

        • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not sure why you’re citing a false statistic

          It’s because it comes from the Ukrainian ministry of defense, it’s official Ukrainian data

          • ex10n@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            The capabilities of Ukraine to be able to make these assessments are lacking due to the chaos Russian forces decided to bring to their country. I would take their numbers with a grain of salt, requiring corroboration, however the true numbers likeli lie somewhere in the middle of the highest and lowest casualty counts emminated by intelligence.

    • FakeNewsForDogs [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I really don’t mean this in a condescending way, and I understand why someone consuming certain kinds of media might think this… but this is truly delusional. So wildly at odds with the reality of the situation that you would probably be better served just not reading about the conflict at all than by reading whatever it is you’ve been reading.

      • ex10n@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I intake media from all sides, it’s important to know the scope of propaganda coming from every outlet. Fortunately there’s enough sources to corroborate the information I’ve relayed here. For the Russian propaganda machine, the same cannot be said. How’s Prigozhin doing?

          • ex10n@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Propaganda is rhetoric designed to produce support for or against particular decisions/actions. Russian propaganda is shaped to meet Putin’s goals, but easily disproven and consistently, blatantly false.

    • الأرض ستبقى عربية@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Russia clearly won, but even if your interjection is plausible. Not if we (Arabs) succeed in dragging the US into another losing war in the Middle East. They are already abandoning Ukraine for Israel. Just imagine if we managed to get troops in Yemen. The US is exercising restraint with Yemen for a reason, already spread too thin and just came out of two losing wars, and we will keep triggering it until it bites.

      • ex10n@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not really, the US has been pumping the breaks on Israeli aid because of the indiscriminate bombings in Gaza. The US believes the civilians in Gaza have a right to their territory as a 2 state solution is desired.

        • الأرض ستبقى عربية@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          The US is bankrolling the genocide and vetoed the ceasefire. Who are you lying to? The US and its interests are a fair and legitimate targets because of its involvement and complicity in the genocide.

          Joe Biden Moves to Lift Nearly Every Restriction on Israel’s Access to U.S. Weapons Stockpile https://theintercept.com/2023/11/25/biden-israel-weapons-stockpile-arms-gaza/

          Don’t be fooled. Biden is fully signed up to ethnic cleansing in Gaza https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/israel-palestine-war-gaza-biden-fully-signed-up-genocide

          • ex10n@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            As a defensive partner it makes sense to continue to provide aid and arms to Israel for defensive purposes, which includes the removal of a condemned terrorist organization as the acting government of the Gaza strip. This does not reduce or remove the US effort to provide aid and humanitarian support to the citizens of Gaza. A 2 state solution remains the policy of the United States, even if this is a foil with both Hamas and the Netantahu government.

            • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              I want you to consider this comment and compare it to your previous comment above. You said that the US is reducing spending on Israel because of Israel’s brutal actions. Then when it was pointed out to you that they in fact were doing the opposite, your response was not to then say “wow, that’s really shitty of them” but instead to try and justify their actions to yourself.

              Have you no brain? No heart? No soul? No spine? Is this really the person you want to be? Someone licking the boot of the dickhead politicians in Washington so much that you’ll abandon any and all morals to do so? It’s ok to be mad at your government when they do shitty things, even if they are “your team.”

            • الأرض ستبقى عربية@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              defensive purposes

              You wouldn’t say this if it was Russia bombing Ukrainians. I’m gonna blame this on racism against Arabs. No other reason to describe the murder of 18,000 civilians and the bombing of schools and hospitals as defensive.

              condemned terrorist organization

              Citation needed.

              According to Wikipedia the countries that consider it as terrorist are only than 13% of the world’s population. That doesn’t seem like much condemnation when 87% of the world aren’t on board.

              • ex10n@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Russia has been and is currently bombing Ukrainians on sovereign land. Pretty easy to learn this tidbit of information.

                • الأرض ستبقى عربية@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  And the Palestinians are bombed where? in the skies? they are being bombed on their own land that was stolen from them, and in the refugee camps they are forced to live in. Internally displaced on their own land.

                  • ex10n@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Was this supposed to draw a response? Can you reiterate your question?

            • riseuppikmin [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Actions are more important than words. The U.S. is going out of its way to expedite the artillery needed to continue Israel’s indiscriminate bombing of civillians in its ongoing genocidal campaign against Palestinians.

              Please I am begging you do not take these organizations at face value- read what the poster above you sent and recognize the distance between the statement “You need to comply with international law more closely” and the action: here is a way for us to get you bombs for you to use more quickly.

              If on one hand part of the state apparatus is signaling for “restraint” but the state is accelerating its ability to provide weapons that its calling for restraint in use of the actual stance is clear: what you’re doing is fine by the state.

              • ex10n@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s alright, we can agree to disagree. Biden has criticized the Netanyahu government for their treatment of Palestinians. More should be done to ensure their safety, hence the conditial provisions of arms, but the United States policy stance has clear ambitions for a 2 state solution. Neither Hamas, nor the Netantahu government are okay with this, however it remains the United States ambition. I truly hope we can see this conflict resolved in my lifetime.

                • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Did anyone ever tell you the saying “actions speak louder than words” as a kid? Now apply that to state actors. No matter what words their US uses, no matter their criticism, their actions are very clear.

                  • ex10n@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    I’m glad I could help to open your mind to change! I appreciate the thoughtful debate, we need more of this in public discourse!

                • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  You still haven’t been able to back up your claim that the USA is putting the breaks on it’s aid of Isreal because of the genocide. All you’ve done is point to the US going “we’d like it if you slowed down on the genocide, but we’ll 100 support you if you don’t” and tried to equivocate that as being the same, when it really isn’t.

                  • ex10n@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    I said pumping the breaks. There’s still legitimate concern for the removal of Hamas as the acting government of Gaza. Neither Hamas, nor the Netantahu backed Israeli government want a 2 state solution, however this remains the US states policy. Whoever can broker a deal that affirms a 2 state solution here will hopefully produce meaningful change towards this conflict.

                  • ex10n@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    As far as I’m aware, the US has not fired any weapons on Gaza soil. There’s been some defensive strikes to the north in Lebanon, but that’s it. Seems like a stretch to call the United States complicit when it’s goals do not align with the Netantahu government.

    • RedFortress@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Who needs to save face? Ukraine has become the world’s street ***** begging everyone for money wherever it goes.

      • ex10n@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        And they’ll keep receiving said money because the majority of the United Nations believes Russia is the aggressor. Allowing an aggressor to overtake soverign land is a big no-no to the UN.

        • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Allowing an aggressor to overtake soverign land is a big no-no to the UN

          Which is why Israel was stopped from annexing East Jerusalem and the West Bank right? It also explains why the US was not allowed to invade and occupy Syria.

          • ex10n@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            While this may be a desired goal of Netanyahus government, his support by Israelis is dwindling. Let’s not forget Hamas’s desired goals too. In the future, hopefully a more progressive Israeli government echos the United States policy more closely for a 2 state solution.

              • ex10n@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Please refrain from the use of this hateful language. It does not promote thoughtful debate.

                • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  hateful language

                  did you look at the name of the comm?

                  unlimited death to israel, nato, america, eu, japan, worst korea, the moon and mosquitos

                  • ex10n@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    I’m not sure what a comm is, I’m just commenting on a thread that appears in my “Hot” list. That sounds distasteful and warmongering. I don’t think violence or death threats should ever be supported. Hopefully humanity can learn from this disgusting statement. A defensive pact, which NATO is, does not apply aggression towards sovereign nations.

        • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          because the majority of the United Nations believes Russia is the aggressor.

          Source?

          Allowing an aggressor to overtake soverign land is a big no-no to the UN.

          Lol

    • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Russia has lost 87% of its deployed troops by recent estimates

      This is dangerous Russian propaganda because according to the Ukrainian ministry of defense they actually lost over 100%

      They also destroyed over 100% of tanks and artillery, the videos of Russian tanks advancing is actually Kremlin dezinformatsiya AI generated fakes

      • ex10n@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Thank you for recognizing dangerous Russian propaganda and the fact that Ukaine does not have full access to their soverign land to make fully accurate assessments. If the aggressor wee to leave occupied territory, then I believe these numbers would come down a bit, however it’s clear Russia has lost considerably fighting this “special operation” in another countries soverign territory.

    • Absolute@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you seriously believe that 87% of russian troops have been lost you need to take a long hard look at why you think that’s true. Like think about it, if theyve lost that many troops then why haven’t the battle lines shifted in any meaningful way basically all year ? Why is there no outrage and overflowing graveyards, or increased mobilization in Russia if thats the case ?

      Seriously like whatever side of the conflict you’re on aside, if you want any intellectual credibility you gotta think about that one

      • ex10n@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Deployed troops, not troop reserves. The estimates are fairly accurate and have been fact checked by multiple intelligence groups. There’s burn pits for the bodies of dead Russians, don’t exactly need a graveyard when they go up in smoke.

        • SovietyWoomy [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Which intelligence groups? Surely ones with actual credibility, right? Not the ones that lied about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction. Not the ones that lied about covid being a Chinese bioweapon while murdering their own citizens because doing something to protect people from covid would reduce profits. Not the ones that lied about Hamas beheading babies. Any intelligence group that ever spread any of those lies has zero credibility.