• aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Even though it’s scientifically unsupportable, I’m still genuinely interested in what it’s like to live on Vega.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Listen up, carnoid of planet Omnius, many geological surveys have shown robust evidence that Vega is capable of harboring all known forms of humanoid life and that its atmospheric makeup in fact provides benefits for cardiovascular health and hivemind coherency.

  • hibsen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Crazy how much juicy drama that community has been providing. The rest need to step up or this place will just be about vegans.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is simultaneously the most hilarious and least consequential meltdown on the internet this year.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Okay now I’m just getting ready to block Beaver, thejerkface and Thelemmybud because they just keep spamming this all over the place. I don’t know if their intention is to try to drum up support but it should be obvious to them from the number of downvotes they keep getting that their crocodile tears aren’t working.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    The Lemmy/Reddit moderator structure is a failure. Communities should have democratic governance.

    On this specific issue I think everyone involved needs to take a deep breath, step away from the issue for like 24 hours, and talk to each other respectfully to work out how this should be resolved. But that is just my opinion.

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It would be fantastic to see an automated system, like with X downvotes a post or comment gets hidden, yet all it takes is one extra click to show it so it doesn’t mean much.

      However, the Lemmy devs seem strictly pro-authoritarian so I expect to never see that on Lemmy, unless it is developed and shown to work elsewhere and becomes too popular to ignore. i.e. the power-tripping gods people in charge is baked right in as a feature, not a bug (it would seem).

      But… maybe in Piefed, Sublinks, Mbin, or something else?

    • Blaze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Communities should have democratic governance.

      I’ve seen some instances elect their admins. No mod election yet, but that probably happened somewhere.

      To be fair, as a mod myself, the issue is usually to get potential mod candidates in the first place.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I wonder what kind of structure they used. I’m also a mod mainly because somebody has to be. But my communities are small and not controversial so I haven’t had to do anything controversial either. It’s mostly that I’m willing to keep an eye on things.

        However, maybe I should walk the walk and start thinking about how that might work in case they grow to the point where more moderation becomes necessary.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Hi vegans! I’m not really inclined to go anywhere near c/vegan while you’re working all this stuff out so while you’re here let me just take this opportunity to say I admire your diet and stuff. Glad you’re around, hope it goes well.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m neither mod nor member. Maybe people could leave them alone and stop picking fights, then wallowing in self-victimization over reactive abuse, aka abuse-by-proxy. It is abuse and it is ugly.

  • stormesp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    All they did was kick a bunch of mods that were harming a community and trying to create drama without even having the balls to discuss openly the reasons they were banning people. The comments about how a moderator that was there for 3 months should have more power than a moderator that had been there for 11 days (despite one of them not having the wellbeing of the community as a priority) is an amazing joke. https://lemmy.world/post/19731457 everyone should read this post and they will quickly understand after reading op and the comments from people like jerkface why this happened. Posting a modlog without context or explanation is acting in pretty bad faith here.

    Also, as a community (lemmy as a whole) we should think if we want to keep people like Beaver who moderates 100+ communities, there are a lot of people moderating way more than they can chew and becoming really stupid, as also seen recently with the bot drama in news on lemmy world. We really love to be repeating reddits problems.

    • JonsJava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I take it that was a swipe at me.

      Sorry you feel that way.

      I don’t do as much moderation as my co-mods, and that’s by design. All our moderators are active and spread across the globe.

      I just happen to be the face of the community.

      Also, thanks for being civil. You don’t want to see the DMs mods got. It was brutal.

    • Blaze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      100+ communities,

      95 of those are inactive.

      There are mods on LW who moderate 10 active communities. Even further, any LW admins can virtually mod all of the LW community.

      also seen recently with the bot drama in news on lemmy world.

      Indeed.

  • AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I mean the fact that the 3 of you have a particularly similar aggressive nature and after leaving 1 post all came here to keep up the exact same kind of bitchiness is not helping your argument.

    Beaver started banning people for downvoting posts. A fellow mod reached out to Beaver to say that had not been the policy and if they wanted that to be the policy going forward the mods would need to discuss it. Beaver then ignored the request to discuss the new policy that Beaver arbitrarily decided on. The issue here seems to be Beaver, period.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Aggressive? Gasp. BITCHINESS? I am wounded. But I still love you.

      Would you care to assay on what justification exists to demod me?

      • AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Well I’m not a mod and I didn’t demod you, but from my opinion of how it played out A, you immediately jumped to Beavers defense and said you didn’t have a problem banning people for downvoting, B, immediately tried to downplay them not responding to the mod request to discuss that action, C, based on how you’re responding here sound completely unfit to be a mod which should require a certain level of maturity, and of course D the possibility that you’re an alt.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Thanks. Interesting thoughts.

          A) is an opinion and it was stated as an opinion, since the post served in place of the discussion that was skipped. I feel justified in sharing my opinion about the direction I want the community to take. I can’t force my views on anyone, and it seems amazingly insecure to respond to that with a unilateral de-mod.

          B) was a request for patience and discussion before people started de-modding each other. But okay, let’s call it “downplaying” for the sake of argument. I don’t see how such downplaying amounts to justification to de-mod me.

          C) I can’t respond to but I do find it rather uncharitable. If you can give an example, I’d appreciate that. And D) I can never assure someone who wishes to believe otherwise.

          When it comes down to it, it sounds like you are saying the other mod was justified in de-modding me because I voiced disagreement with his choices. Plus a bunch of other stuff about me just plain not deserving to be a mod for reasons I admit I don’t grasp; that I’m just intrinsically deserving of being de-modded. Have I got it?