“It could have been worse,” one owner incredibly concluded.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    On one hand, that’s pretty funny. But why would you allow the thing on the internet? No experience with robot vacuums, but don’t you just throw in on the floor? Set and forget?

    • ericjmorey@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It needs to communicate to the phone app somehow and anything else is going to be too big a hurdle for a huge portion of the customer base.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        They would be within the same local wifi network. Or you could even use Bluetooth for a direct connection. There’s no reason for those things to connect to the internet, unless you want to update the firmware. Anything else is just a security and privacy risk.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Even to update firmware, your phone could download the blob from the servers and then send it to the device via Bluetooth.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think you’d even need the device itself to be connected to the internet for firmware. Your phone connects to the internet, gathers up the firmware, sends it to the device over BT. That’s how my helmet comms work.

          • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            If the device is connected to the local network and has some sort of maintenance UI then it might as well. I just don’t want it to be constantly connected or do it on its own.

        • ericjmorey@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Good point. But they market the ability to interact with the vacuum machine when you’re away from the house and it seems that this feature gains them more customers than they lose.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        anything else is going to be too big a hurdle for a huge portion of the customer base.

        That’s just a lie companies tell to try to excuse their theft of your data. They could make it work locally and be user-friendly at the same time if they wanted to, but they just don’t want to.

        • ericjmorey@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think it’s a lie to say that the majority of the customer base cares more about convenience and novelty than security of their vacuum.