• KnoLord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      On another post where a web comic showed similar artifacts, I also asked the same question - and concluded that the comic’s resolution was “enhanced”, either by the phone itself (when they saved it from their source) or by a (re)poster. So I think that here it’s the same thing - AI “”“enhancement”“”.

      • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Is this an Android thing?

        Context: Am iOS user taking photos in RAW and sometimes ProRes

        Edit: Maybe instead of downvoting you could explain how wrong I am. I’ve never seen this outside AI so I’m genuinely asking where these photos are coming from.

        • doktormerlin@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          Deutsch
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That doesn’t make sense, RAW is a file format and has nothing to do with AI enhancement. Also, RAW files are not uploadable to websites (they are, but they would look shitty), RAW is a file format that allows a greater range of adjustments at a later point for professionals (like using Lightroom).

          ProRes is apparently (I googled it) a VIDEO format.

          There might be phones that have shitty AI resolution enhancement built into their camera app, but most likely that’s not the case here. This image just went through an AI upscaler, which is a website or an app that works on Android and iOS, but it has nothing to do with the vendor

          • vividspecter@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            From what I recall, Apple has a “pseudo” RAW format called ProRAW that isn’t really RAW but just has less processing.

          • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            My reasoning for saying which formats I use is I’ve never seen such terrible compression. Why would anyone butcher their photos to such an extent? This is infinitely worse than just using JPEG.

            • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Compression and formats can be separate from one another. For example, the image taken could be “sharpened” by some garbage AI before being saved in whatever file format. This kind of smoothing is typical for something like that.

              • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Right, but in this case I wasn’t sure if it was horrible compression or just an AI-generated image. So again, my reasoning for saying what I formats I use was to give some context: I’ve never seen such awful artifacts, nor have I been given the option to use a format that creates such artifacts (that I’m aware of).

                If I have already known all this, I probably wouldn’t have commented. Weird “let’s fight” vibes on this post.

    • glitch1985@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Compression. I saw very similar “smoothing” on a zoomed in photo I took recently at home as the city sign in the background shows.

      Edit: these are a bunch of turkeys that were about 50 feet away but once I zoomed into the picture the texture seemed really off.

    • skyspydude1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s kind of both. A lot of modern Samsung phones do this really weird “AI Enhancement” shit to improve the look of zoomed in shots. I remember testing it out at Best Buy, taking pictures of some Blu-rays on the other side of the store with the 20x zoom option. The original photo was pretty much what you’d expect, it looked like a low-res super cropped pic, but then it applied the “AI Enhancement” and did it’s best to fill in the text and price labels, and wound up looking exactly like a bunch of garbled AI text.