“Attention to all blacks who plan to vote for Trump,” the sign outside New Era Baptist Church reads, “you are an ignorant stupid negro.” The other side says, “Warning African Americans: A vote for Trump will put Blacks back to picking cotton.”

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    This church has an almost entirely black congregation and is led by a black pastor. I am A+ 100% OK with them using edgy language to call out racism. I’m glad they’re being so vocal about it.

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not a fan of that rage-bait head-line.

    Big difference between n - - - - and n - - - - -.

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The latter is a slur, and arguably is currently the most vulgar word in the English language.

      The former is considered archaic (at worst) in English, but completely ordinary in Spanish.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That word may be ordinary in Spanish, but something tells me (the complete lack of other Spanish words, as well as the context) that in this case it was meant in the “archaic” form.

        Also idk if it’s “archaic at worst,” “at worst” it is still a slur in many contexts. Like, you can talk about The Negro League in historical context referring to baseball and be completely fine, but you absolutely cannot go up to someone and say “What up my Ne–o” (gonna bleep that one, but leave enough context so you can tell it’s not intended to be the other one.) “You are an ignorant stupid ne–o” seems to fit squarely in the context of slur to me and imo its use here is in bad taste at best and frankly I think it is racist.

        Not that I disagree with hating trump, I just think hating trump so hard you become racist isn’t really a good solution to the problem, and the church could probably rework that sign.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    4 days ago

    Local Trump supporters expressed opposition, including, Daxton Kirk, who told WZDX he reached out to city officials regarding the sign.

    You should not be able to come into a building and feel like you are hated or diversified just because you came here to worship the Lord,” Kirk said.

    fukkin self-awarewolf

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      This church hurt my feelings so their First Amendment rights should be violated.

      I agree that churches playing politics should be taxed as long as the law is applied consistently. With 100% certainty this Trumper would shit his pants in rage if the such justice occurred to a MAGA church.

      In fact, all churches should be taxed. Those doing charitable work can apply for the nonprofit status like everyone else.

      • ProbablyBaysean@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        According to US case law. The power to tax is the power to destroy, so the state government cannot tax federal government.

        There are several arguments for taxing church and I can’t help but think that soon we will be just having a closer relationship between church and state if the pastors start pandering for the current government.

      • ultranaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 days ago

        He believes diversity is a bad thing so getting diversified is not something he wants happening to him. I don’t think it goes beyond that, just a dumb fascist being a dumb fascist.

  • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I agree with the sign, but churches must stay out of politics. It’s time that churches stop being tax exempt.

    • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean I agree with the sentiment, but churches have been openly discussing and endorsing specific political views and candidates for quite a while now, and this trend is getting more and more widespread and extreme.

      Nobody actually enforces the Johnson amendment.

    • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unil Republicans are punished for using churches to brainwash the already brainwashed, fuck that separation bullshit. Fight fire with fire.

  • anachronist@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    I sure do hope Trump’s hiring a racist comedian and Speaker Johnson’s self-defeating stupidity is enough to overcome Democrat’s self-defeating stupidity.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It sounds harsh, but that’s just how Alabamans talk to black people.

    PS: Bring back? When did it leave?

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    53
    ·
    4 days ago

    Whomever came up with this should be investigated for voter intimidation. Threatening people with slavery if they don’t vote for your preferred candidate is not only stupid but illegal.

    • owsei@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Don’t go there, that ally is very dangerous, you will get mugged.

      It’s not a threat, it’s a warning about other people.

      • John Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        36
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s intimidation and I’m sick of people on both sides pretending that it’s okay to intimidate and threaten people about who they should vote for.

        • owsei@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Intimidation. Noun. The act of making timid or fearful or of deterring by threats; the state of being intimidated.

          Threat. Noun. An expression of an intention to inflict pain, harm, or punishment.

          It’s not an intention, it’s information. You won’t do anything, you are saying that, without any interaction, someone else wants and will do that.

          I understand disliking that, but it’s not a threat.

          • John Richard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Intimidation doesn’t require a direct threat and you should know this. All it requires is a statement intended to make people fear for their safety.

              • John Richard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                3 days ago

                If you put that at a voting site or said people would die of high voltage because of voting for Kamala then yes that could constitute voter intimidation. You think I’m saying this only to help Trump? I’m saying it is a problem from both Republicans and Democrats. Why are you so offended about that?

                • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I’m saying fuck Trump, and fuck Putin, and fuck Both Sides astroturfers.

                  You have failed. You should go back to Troth Sential.

            • yuri@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              you’re implying the church somehow has the power to bring back slavery. if they don’t, then your whole argument makes no sense because CLEARLY the intent would be to inform.

              by your logic you could argue that fire alarms are likewise a tool for intimidation. sure, it’s meant to inform you of a danger for your own personal safety, but what if there is no danger and they’re just intimidating you into leaving?

              e: a couple missing words