Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last weekā€™s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

  • ShakingMyHead@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    Ā·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You know that thing that happened with the AI generated DOOM?

    Well, someone decided to do the same thing with Minecraft, and you can see that the results areā€¦ basically abysmal:
    https://youtu.be/7Jd-Rr9cJYo?si=-9XZ51ss6cBuSiC3 Skip to 2:00 for the actual ā€œgameplayā€.

    TL:DW nothing is saved outside of the view screen, things arenā€™t even saved within the view screen, the resolution is like 240p at 20fps, input latency and mouse latency is awful, and this was all apparently done by training on literal millions of hours of Minecraft footage. The mid-range computer I had from 2006 could run the game better than this. A 14-year-old netbook could run the game better than whatever supercomputer theyā€™re using to render this.

    Note that the person in the video isnā€™t part of the team/whoever that created it, just someone who is reviewing it.

    • ebu@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      maybe iā€™m a weirdo but i actually really like this a lot. if there werenā€™t armies of sycophants chanting outside of all our collective windows about how AI is the future of gamingā€¦ if you look at this ā€œgameā€ as an art object unto itself i think it is actually really engaging

      it reminds me of other ā€œgamesā€ like Marian Kleinebergā€™s Wave Function Collapse and Bananaftā€™s Yedoma Globula. thereā€™s one other on the tip of my tongue where you uploaded an image and it constantly reprojected the image onto the walls of a first-person walking simulator, but i donā€™t recall the name

      • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        Ā·
        2 months ago

        I do like it also, but notice how they try to hide most of these strange effects in their demo video. Theyā€™re trying to pass it off as a playable minecraft. Anything interesting about the technology is a defect to these people.

        They also claim this is ā€œthe first playable AI-generated gameā€ when the exact same sort of thing already existed in 2022 (and it looked a lot more efficient and haunted): https://madebyoll.in/posts/game_emulation_via_dnn/ Maybe it doesnā€™t count if you call it ā€œNeural networkā€ instead of ā€œAIā€.

        • JFranek@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          Ā·
          2 months ago

          That article gave me a whiplash. First part: pretty cool. Second part: deeply questionable.

          For example these two paragraphs from sections ā€˜problem with codeā€™ and ā€˜magic of dataā€™:

          ā€œModular and interpretable codeā€ sounds great until you are staring at 100 modules with 100,000 lines of code each and someone is asking you to interpret it.

          Regardless of how complicated your programā€™s behavior is, if you write it as a neural network, the program remains interpretable. To know what your neural network actually does, just read the dataset

          Well, ā€œjust read the dataset broā€ sound great sounds great until you are staring at a dataset with 100 000 examples and someone is asking you to interpret it.

          • bitofhope@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            Ā·
            1 month ago

            What the hell is this even arguing for? Is one module with ten million lines somehow better than 100 modules Ć  100k lines?

        • ebu@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          Ā·
          2 months ago

          yeah, that ā€œmost of the internet will be Al-generatedā€ nonsense is tanking my ability to take them as domain experts seriously.

          still, something gets me about completely generated, transient-when-youā€™re-not-looking, constantly shifting worlds. might have to collect more examples

          • Evinceo@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            Ā·
            2 months ago

            still, something gets me about completely generated, transient-when-youā€™re-not-looking, constantly shifting worlds. might have to collect more examples

            Itā€™s dream logic.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      Showed this to my wife.

      You know what the worst part is? Weā€™re spending all this computing power to generate this bad acid trip, but if I just took a bunch of LSD you know what Iā€™d still have? The things in my pockets. Iā€™d have a better time just having a bunch of LSD and walking down to the 7-11

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      Note that the person in the video isnā€™t part of the team/whoever that creates it, just someone who is reviewing it.

      See, thereā€™s the mistake. You canā€™t let outside people actually interact with the thing; you need to stick with cherry-picked 2-3s clips.

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      Iā€™ve seen this floating about quite a bit, and everyone I know is dunking on it - the most frequent comparison Iā€™ve seen is calling it ā€œMinecraft with dementiaā€.

      • ShakingMyHead@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        Ā·
        2 months ago

        It also shows why those DOOM demos were only 2-3 seconds long, because thatā€™s how long it can keep cohesion for.

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      2 months ago

      oh cool, Minecraft LSD: Dream Emulator edition

      which would be a cool concept, if the generative AI model werenā€™t incredibly prohibitively expensive to run, trained on plagiarized videos, and incapable of coherently tracking state (believe it or not, LSD: Dream Emulator does have a gameplay and progression loopā€¦ game-like things without one tend to get dull very quick)

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        2 months ago

        game-like things without one tend to get dull very quick

        This has been a thing with games leaning heavily on procedural generated content as well. Takes a lot of effort to make those more interesting in the longer term. The ai is the future of gaming people are sure to rediscover this fact again. Sadly compared ro pgc people they will waste a lot more energy and money.

        • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          Ā·
          2 months ago

          I think itā€™s fine to have little art games that are only interesting to play for a few minutes. They can still have an impact that stays with you forever. Catacombs of Solaris for instance is one I love and think about all the time.

          These AI guys though, god it must be so sad working on this stuff. They canā€™t be proud of what theyā€™re making if the goal is to trick people into thinking you can have a real Minecraft game in there. The game is not even relevant, as far as I can tell theyā€™re only using it to draw attention to their stupid and doomed ASIC business.

          • ebu@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            Ā·
            2 months ago

            goddammit! you have no idea how many variations of ā€œfirst person walking simulator projected image texture trippy visualsā€ i slapped into every search engine!

            but yes, that was the one i was thinking of

            • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              Ā·
              2 months ago

              Ah awesome! I didnā€™t think it was because you canā€™t upload pictures, but maybe you can in the ā€œRevisitedā€ version!

              • ebu@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                Ā·
                2 months ago

                i went and bought it, and yup, the revisited version is the one i was thinking of. time to walk around inside a picture of Sam Altman so i can absorb his raw intellect and business acumen

          • Soyweiser@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            Ā·
            2 months ago

            Pgc can be a useful tool in the toolbox however. Just look at dwarf fortress for example. But games need more than just that. And with LLMs there could also ve some use (generation of voices I think for example, or some low level of conversational chatter). The problem is the data usage, the anti worker stuff (no voice actor wants their voice stolen for example), and like in this case, the people just promoting their other crap. Like how crypto games are just a shell to promote their crypto bs.

            LLMs could have some minor use but with the backlash due to techbros going their usual vc style techbro ways, and steam requiring disclosure I doubt it will be of much use the risk is too great. Which considering the power costs is great.

            • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              Ā·
              2 months ago

              We also have stuff like DLSS, which is pretty cool and I imagine ends up being more efficient in energy usage. The key thing I believe is itā€™s built as a specific tool for a specific purpose, instead of general purpose slop machines eating humongous databases to excrete absolutely nothing useful for anyone.