• Voyajer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yes sacrifice your livelihood so that someone else can implement the feature anyway.

    Just use an ad blocker.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yes sacrifice your livelihood so that someone else can implement the feature anyway.

      Yes, that’s called having a backbone, aligning your actions with your own moral code.

      This is the same logic as ‘well if I had quit my executioner job, someone else would have done it, therefore I am a morally blameless and non hypocritical executioner who is against the death penalty.’

      Just use an ad blocker.

      Obviously this is the easy solution for yourself personally. Costs you nothing, benefits yourself, allows the systemic bad practice to continue.

      The actually accurate analogue would be to contribute toward actually creating or maintaining a free and widely usable adblocker, an alternate platform, to do something that helps other people overcome the problem.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Yep, the classic dilemma of software devs with YouTube on their resume:

          Keep working for YouTube, or never work at any other software company or non profit organization or any other employer that wants software devs, or any other kind of job, and just starve to death.

          Its truly a shame the software dev’s decisions are so binary.