IIHS researchers analyzed pedestrian crashes to develop injury risk curves showing how speed affects crash outcomes. They found that the effect of crash speed on injury risk was magnified for vehicles with taller front ends. Compared with risk curves developed using crash data from Europe, where tall passenger vehicles are less common, risk curves for the U.S. show pedestrians here begin to suffer more serious injuries at lower speeds.

  • .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Before anyone is like “of course, we already knew this”

    Now it’s proven with empirical data. This is what matters.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      The issue isn’t data, the issue is breaking the car culture. I’ve seen people nearly hit a pedestrian with right of way at a crosswalk while their car was turning right on red. Most of the time they freak out along the lines of “get out of the road, this is for cars.” We’ve adopted a terrible attitude of the car driver is always right and the pedestrian is always wrong and that is the biggest thing that needs to change. We constantly accept dangerous designs that take pedestrians, drivers, and cyclists lives to save people literally SECONDS on their daily commute and whenever someone is hurt we blame the human factors instead of the designs of roads and cars.

      We can throw as much data as we want, unfortunately it seems most drivers are on the side that seconds are more valuable than life.

      • .Donuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’d argue that in order to (help) break this insane car culture, you need empirical data to prove it. This to counter the “it’s not really proven, there’s no evidence, just feelings” crowd.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          We have the data. In my area an ancient subway moves more people than the widest highway in north america. They fight tooth and nail to prevent any new rail projects and literally have to print new laws to keep building highways that only make congestion worse. In my opinion it is way more of a culuture war than a numbers war. Many places, and even people, in north america will treat you as a second class citizen if you take transit but we bend over backwards to shave seconds off of car travel.