Will Manidis is the CEO of AI-driven healthcare startup ScienceIO

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    2 days ago

    (Already said this before, but let me reiterate:)

    Typical AITA post:

    Title: AITAH for calling out my [Friend/Husband/Wife/Mom/Dad/Son/Daughter/X-In-Law] after [He/She] did [Undeniably something outrageous that anyone with an IQ above 80 should know its unacceptable to do]?

    Body of post:

    [5-15 paragraph infodumping that no sane person would read]

    I told my friend this and they said I’m an asshole. AITAH?

    Comments:

    Comment 1: NTA, you are abosolutely right, you should [Divorce/Go No-Contact/Disown/Unfriend, the person] IMMEDIATELY. Don’t walk away, RUNNN!!!

    Comment 2: NTA, call the police! That’s totally unacceptable!

    And sometimes you get someone calling out OP… 3: Wait, didn’t OP also claim to be [Totally different age and gender and race] a few months ago? Heres the post: [Link]


    🙄 C’mon, who even think any of this is real…

    • WilderSeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      It’s “reality television” on a discussion forum to karma farm and help push other kinds of misinformation.

    • WilderSeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m thinking of pulling the plug on Reddit (at least for a while). My tipping point has become how the “drone” story is becoming popular. At first it was intriguing and mysterious (the airport shutdowns and reports of large vehicles at low levels was fascinating), but I’m getting the vibe it’s a misinformation campaign to distract the US from how we are about to be changed.

      I was actually permabanned in the “News” sub for an innocuous comment. All it was is that I noted the federal authorities are likely correct for saying most of the reports of “UFOs” are likely airplanes and manmade drones, and to play devil’s advocate I mentioned there were likely legitimate reports of UAPs, but since the majority were probably mistaken planes the Federal agencies’ reactions were technically truthful.

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Man, sometimes when I finish grabbing something I needed from Reddit, I hit the frontpage (always logged out) just out of morbid curiosity.
      Every single time that r/AmIOverreacting sub is there with the most obvious “no, you’re not” situation ever.

      I never once seen that sub show up before the exodus. AI or not, I refuse to believe any frontpage posts from that sub are anything other than made up bullshit.

    • Way too many…

      I was born before the Internet. The Internet is always lumped into the “entertainment” part of my brain. A lot of people that have grown up knowing only the Internet think the Internet is much more “real”. It’s a problem.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’ve come up with a system to categorize reality in different ways:

        Category 1: Thoughts inside my brain formed by logics

        Category 2: Things I can directly observe via vision, hearing, or other direct sensory input

        Category 3: IRL Other people’s words, stories, anecdotes, in face to face conversations

        Category 4: Acredited News Media, Television, Newspaper, Radio (Including Amateur Radio Conversations), Telegrams, etc…

        Category 5: The General Internet

        The higher the category number, means the more distant that information is, and therefore more suspicious I am.

        I mean like, if a user on Reddit (or any internet fourm or social media for that matter) told me X is a valid treatment for X disease without like real evidence, I’m gonna laugh in their face (well not their face, since its a forum, but you get the idea).

          • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            So here’s the thing:

            I sometimes though I saw a ghost moving in a dark cornet of my eyes.

            I didn’t see a ghost.

            But then later I walk through the same place again, and also saw the same vision, but I already held the belief that ghosts dont exist, so I investigated, it turned out to be a lamp (that was off) that casted a shadow of another light source, so, when I happend to walk though the area, the shadow moved, and combined with my head turning motion, it made it appear like a ghost was there, but it was just a difference in lighting, a shadow. Not a ghost. I bet a lot of “ghosts” could be just interpreting lighting wrong and think its a ghost, not an actual ghost.

            Having you thoughts/logics prioritized is important to find the truth, and not just start believing the first thing you interpret like a vision of a “ghost”.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I genuinely miss the 90s. I mean, yeah, early forms of internet and computers existed, but not everyone had a camera, and not everyone got absolutely bukkaked with disinformation. Not that I think everything is bad about the tech in of itself, but how we use it nowadays is just so exhausting.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If it’s well-written enough to be entertaining, it doesn’t even matter whether it’s real or not. Something like it almost certainly happened to someone at some point.

    • SerotoninSwells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Look at that, the detection heuristics all laid out nice and neatly. The only issue is that Reddit doesn’t want to detect bots because they are likely using them. Reddit at one point was using a form of bot protection but it wasn’t for posts; instead, it was for ad fraud.