We took a trip through decades of the genre and came up with a list of the most important and best hard science fiction movies of all time. They are the essence and the foundations of the book of sci-fi rules that’s still being written as we, the audience, become much more self-aware of our relationship with technology, the future, and whatever those two will bring.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Solid first few, then it went to kid’s films? Really not impressed by the list at all, like the furthest they reached back was Blade Runner and only mentioned it because it’s popular, not because it was a genre defining film.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Blade Runner absolutely brought cyberpunk to the big screen, it was absolutely genre defining for a lot of people. Prior it was just Neuromancer that imagined it.

        Plus they had “Metropolis” from 1927, did you read the whole list? Lol

  • Rolando@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Their list:

     15 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
    
     14 Interstellar (2014) 
    
     13 Gattaca (1997) 
    
     12 Solaris (1972) 
    
     11 Ex Machina (2015) 
    
     10 Coherence (2013) 
     
     9 Sunshine (2007)  
    
     8 Primer (2004) 
     
     7 Stalker (1979) 
    
     6 Gravity (2013) 
    
     5 THX 1138 (1971) 
     
     4 Ad Astra (2019) 
     
     3 Contact (1997) 
     
     2 The Martian (2015) 
    
     1 Blade Runner (1982) 
    
    

    doesn’t contain Arrival (2016) wtf.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Conspicuous in its absence: anything animated, like Ghost in the Shell (1995), which I’d argue is harder than quite a few things on this list.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Great movie, but I’m not sure it’s considered “hard SF.” There’s no real basis to anchor much of the science in it.

      • toddestan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d say the same thing about “Sunshine” and “Interstellar”.

        Some movies I might consider including, in no particular order:

        • Moon (2009)
        • 2010: The Year We Make Contact (1984)
        • Silent Running (1972)
      • Rolando@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Both the book and the screenwriting required the invention of a form of alien linguistics which recurs in the plot. The film uses a script designed by the artist Martine Bertrand (wife of the production designer Patrice Vermette), based on scriptwriter Heisserer’s original concept. Computer scientists Stephen and Christopher Wolfram analyzed it to provide the basis for Banks’s work in the film.[32][33] Their works are summarized in a GitHub repository.[34] Three linguists from McGill University were consulted. The sound files for the alien language were created with consultation from Morgan Sonderegger, a phonetics expert. Lisa Travis was consulted for set design during the construction of the scientist’s workplaces. Jessica Coon, a Canada Research Chair in Syntax and Indigenous Languages, was consulted for her linguistics expertise during the review of the script.[35]

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrival_(film)

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re trying to say that the fact that they invented a realistic language for the film makes it hard SF, I think that’s quite a stretch. What’s the basis for

          spoiler

          a language changing a human’s concept of time and allowing them to remember the future

          ?

            • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t think we’re connecting here. Hard science fiction is science fiction with an emphasis on scientific accuracy or plausibility. It’s sort of a subgenre, and this list is about movies in that subgenre. It doesn’t mean that there aren’t great SF movies outside of that subgenre, but this isn’t about those.

              • mateomaui@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Although now I have to question the inclusion of Interstellar on this list, because it gets pretty far out there as well, especially at the end.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s been a long time since I’ve seen it. I don’t remember loving the movie, but I thought it got kudos for getting the physics right. No?

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They flew from the Hubble Space Telescope to the ISS using a Manned Maneuvering Unit, nothing about that is “getting the physics right”.

        • Landmammals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The part that had me screaming at the TV was where George clooney’s character and Sandra Bullock’s character were tethered together. There are attached to the space station via straps. George Clooney releases the clip and immediately goes flying off into space. There’s no spinning, nothing at all pulling him away. If he unclipped, he would just hang there.

          I’m not trying to be a stickler here, but if you’re making a movie about space following the basic details of how things move around in space is kind of important.

  • kalkulat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hard to define ‘hard’, a few more I liked: (no ranking)

    • The Time Machine (both the Pal and the Wells films; quite different)

    • Dark City (1998, Pryas)

    • Forbidden Planet (1956, Wilcox)

    • The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951, Wise)

    • Fifth Element (hilarious, Besson, 1997)

    • Alien (Scott, 1979)

    • 13th Floor (Rusnak, 1999)

    • Stargate (1994, Emerich)

    • Steamboy (2004, Otomo)

    Movies made from famed series I’d REALLY LIKE to see:

    • Ringworld (Niven, a crime noone’s DARED to try).

    • Some setting of Riverworld. (Farmer)

    • ANY of Neal Stephenson’s SF books, esp. Snow Crash, Cryptonomicon, Diamond Age, Anathem.

    (Not even the BBC? I mean, who expected Doctor Who to get THIS far?!)

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have no idea what they’re talking about. The only Niven “Known Space” Ringworld games are all DOS based from decades ago.

          However, Halo and Outer Wilds have both taken shots at ringworlds, but they are not Known Space universe.

          • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I was talking about Halo.
            I read Ringworld after playing Halo, thinking “haha I’ll check out this thing that looks like it influenced this game that I enjoyed” but then it turns out Bungie just lifted a bunch of stuff wholesale.

  • thoro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I know Internet lists and opinions and all that, but I’m sorry but any list that puts 2001 behind Interstellar is one to ignore, at least the rankings.

    All good movies on the list, though.

    • state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s very subjective. I hate Interstellar because I think it’s laughably dumb but many other people have a raging hard-on for that shitty movie. Ad Astra was very weird and very boring, but I liked the interesting visuals.