• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I don’t believe Syria ever styled itself “Democratic”. But the Syrian Republic was certainly a republic.

      For that matter, so was the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

      A republic is simply a nation with no monarch. If you don’t believe me ask any Canadian, as they are constantly debating whether to officially leave the British crown and become a republic.

      • ghurab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Not as a title, but if i recall correctly, the first first article of the old constitution states that the Syrian Arab Republic is a Democracy. Also for what it’s worth, the Baath party was also officially “socialist”.

        The lack of a monarchy isn’t enough to qualify as a republic, the people need to also hold some sort of power.

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yea, the name is originally in latin res publica, meaning “public matter”. In opposition to a kingdom that is the private domain of a single person.