• tibi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Making a movie by taking advantage of a tragedy in which thousands of people lost their homes and some even their lives is in poor taste. Many of these people are vulnerable and don’t have a safety net, they won’t be able to rebuild their lives after this.

      Remember how The Creator got backlash for using footage of the Beirut explosion?

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        So giving them money to use their burned-out land for like, 3 months, is bad? As has always been the case, “poor taste” is exceedingly impractical and negative for society.

        Using real footage of people dying really butts up against the practicality line, but why fake an explosion if it’s already recorded? Same with the train crash thing in a similar vein.

        • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          What if they like put an ad in the newspaper, the people on film who died can write in if they are opposed to it? /S just in case…

      • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Typed from your slave made cellphone from the comfort of your slave sewn clothes… Poor taste indeed.