How does a tree (or any plant, really), know to evolve to produce a delicious fruit or a poison berry, a seed inside an impenetrable shell, or invent a type of flying machine, in order to reproduce? (Each of these examples exists in my backyard)

How do they receive feedback about their evolutionary experiments? How do they know it worked/failed. [10]

  • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    Random mutation. If it reproduces successfully, those genes pass on. If successful enough, it could become the dominant variety. If not successful, that variety will be a small population or die out. That’s all there is to it.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      If it is successful, but isn’t dominant enough to replace the existing variety then we have the start of a new species!

    • masterofn001@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      How does a tree evolve a wing? - not to fly, but to propagate.

      Parallel evolution makes sense to me in the animal kingdom, but a tree evolving winged vehicles for their seed is just mind blowing when I think about it.

      • berries and wings don’t just randomly appear out of nowhere from year to year do they?

      • do we have any physical records of plants actually evolving these different methods like we do with bone structure of primates evolving?

      • Saulkman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        If a tree mutates and it produces a seed that is slightly flatter than its competition, then that seed will fall farther and the tree will be slightly more likely to reproduce over its competition. Repeat this for several million generations over millions and millions of years.

          • meant2live218@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            28 days ago

            A generation just has to be the age gap between a plant and a plant from any of its seeds. So if a tree can start to flower and drop seeds around year 3, then it’s as minimal as a 3-year gap between “generations”.

            • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              28 days ago

              if a tree can start to flower and drop seeds around year 3

              Did you just make this up, or is it actually true for these kinds of trees that can be several thousand years old?

              • meant2live218@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                28 days ago

                Number was plucked out of my ass. But sure, let’s look at a redwood and see when they start reproducing.

                The Sierra Redwood can reproduce sexually (seeds in cones) as early as 24 years old, but one source I found said that seeds are usually not high-quality until the tree is 200+ years old. It also takes about a 2-year maturation period within the cone before being ready for planting. Other types of redwoods can reproduce asexually, which may have an effect on the rate of expression of the mutated genes.

                • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  Sierra Redwood can reproduce sexually (seeds in cones) as early as 24 years old, but one source I found said that seeds are usually not high-quality until the tree is 200+ years old.

                  That’s quite interesting. And impressive, too!

                  Thank you for looking it up.

              • USSMojave@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                28 days ago

                It doesn’t matter how old the trees can ultimately live, just how long it takes for one of its offspring trees to grow enough to then itself make more offspring. And in some species of trees, that can be as little as 3 years

                • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  28 days ago

                  It doesn’t matter how old the trees can ultimately live

                  Thinking about it has given me the hint to ask this question :)

                  I’m not arguing, I wanted to learn something.

          • Dandroid@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            Do your parents have to die for you to be the next generation? No. An organism and it’s offspring are very frequently alive at the same time and apart of different generations. Once an organism has offspring, a new generation exists. So however old an is when it can reproduce, that is the length of a generation for that species. It has nothing to do with how long said organism can live.

      • Apepollo11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        29 days ago

        You might be underestimating the timescales involved.

        For example, grass - super simple organism, right? Should have appeared early on? No, dinosaurs appeared before grass did. But when the first grasses did evolve, wow, they were successful on a scale that is hard to overstate.

        The beauty of sexual reproduction, from an evolutionary point of view, is that by its very nature, it allows many experiments to take place at once. The success criteria of each experiment is how many babies can the subject make.

        Little wings evolve on seed pods for the same reason they evolved on anything else. For whatever reason, each step along the way made them a tiny bit more successful at having babies than those without.

        Maybe a little spike makes them slightly less likely to be eaten, a bigger spike less likely still. A flatter spike helped them catch the wind and scatter further afield, and broader ones further still.

        There’s no feedback needed for individuals in this system - it’s literally a numbers game based on who/what can make the most babies. They’re the ones who, millions of years down the line, end up winning.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        berries and wings don’t just randomly appear out of nowhere from year to year do they?

        They do! Any useful trait is likely to appear more than once in different species.