jeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agoExperts: DOJ has "sufficient evidence" to probe Clarence Thomas — but Garland won't go for itwww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1556arrow-down18
arrow-up1548arrow-down1external-linkExperts: DOJ has "sufficient evidence" to probe Clarence Thomas — but Garland won't go for itwww.salon.comjeffw@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squaremysticpickle@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoMethinks the chap still hopes to be on the supreme court one day and isn’t looking to piss off a potential future colleague.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 months agoChrist, after running an 81 year old Presidential candidate, wouldn’t it just be the thing for Dems to appoint a 72 year old SCOTUS judge.
minus-squareJumpingspiderman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoGarland should never again be near a judgeship. Or anything but retirement for that matter.
Methinks the chap still hopes to be on the supreme court one day and isn’t looking to piss off a potential future colleague.
Christ, after running an 81 year old Presidential candidate, wouldn’t it just be the thing for Dems to appoint a 72 year old SCOTUS judge.
Garland should never again be near a judgeship. Or anything but retirement for that matter.