• SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s because AI tells you what you want to hear, in your case a summary of know events, likely because you asked so and have a different history than a conspiracy obsessed accounts.

      Also the pepe pfp with the comment ‘based’ are enough.

  • nthavoc@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Even if you slap them with the actual, documented footage taken by the US military with video, photos, and paper record of these camps with the EXPLICIT INTENTION to make sure people don’t say “they made all that up” they will still say, “They made all that up.” If you keep going to Twatter for information, you’re basically a idiot at this point and deserve what’s coming for being so misinformed. That goes the same if you use Grok for anything. Let elon run all that into the ground and let it die already. My point is, bad press is good press.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Wait, liars are gonna lie to you, even when you tell them you’re annoyed by them lying?

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Just wanted to say that I talked to my grandma about it, she was working together with the Jews in Auschwitz (my family is from the neighbor village) in a company which made chemicals (IG Farben). When she walked home she could always smell the burned human bodies. She said everyone knew what was going on there.

    • cjk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is backed by evidence.

      After WW2 there was a lot of research about weather people knew or didn’t. Basically the conclusion was: people knew. They actively decided to either ignore it („not my department“), deny it („it’s all lies, the scent is just $foo burning“) or justify it („they deserved it“).

      But people knew.

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      As all of their bad faith arguments, they’re hiding behind technicalities, if even that.

    • JakenVeina@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Same concept as how Trump gave no written order for the Jan 6 mob to storm the capitol building, therefore he’s totally not responsible for it.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Also, you don’t write down orders in a criminal conspiracy. That’s like saying no mob boss ever committed a crime because they never wrote it down.

    • hector@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m not even gonna consider their argument worthy of contradiction because it’s just false. There are numerous written orders, film archives proving the intentionality of Nazi in systemically murdering the Jews, it should be impossible to say that and be taken seriously.

      Sorry if I sound weird, it’s just that the subject is really important to me

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s this neat thing called lying

      There’s no Holocaust order because that’s not what they called it and that’s not how things work, but they had plenty of work orders and ‘final solution’ progress reports

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      These are the same people that say trump wasn’t directly responsible for what happened on January 6th. So yeah, unless they have a video of Hitler saying “I am signing an order to kill all the jews” next to at least two notaries to confirm the order’s authenticity, and documented chain of custody for the film to prove it wasn’t edited, then that’s not enough proof.

      Ah hell, I reminded myself of this halfway through writing https://youtu.be/sHQljMOQdJ4

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Conspiracy theories exist in a limbo where contradictory evidence always supports the theory, unless, of course, it’s fabricated to hide the truth of the conspiracy. It’s your own personal motte-and-bailey.

  • hector@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I didn’t get it yet. I think they’re gonna make it insidious: for most people it will be correct and they will progressively inject confirmation bias when people use it to judge something (e.g @Grok is this true?)

    I think the first step towards destroying the Holocaust memory and all the work of historians +survivors is going to consist in presenting conflicting realities, creating confusion and doubt.

    edit: btw, for now Grok is okay because he reframed my denialism of a simple “conflict” into genocide

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      I think there’s a reason they hid the prompt in the screenshot of OP.

      • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Even if it was real, it was probably made with ultra complex jailbreak prompt. Either way its fake

  • lemonaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    Saw that Onion Person doesn’t have the tweet up.

    Asked grok about it and got a pretty standard answer that you’d expect from a chatbot. I even asked about each point in particular and the answers were good and detailed. Either Onion Person hastily shared a lie (then caught it quickly and deleted it), or grok got patched again. Given the lack of outrage posting that would confirm the latter, I’m going with the former.

    Tl;dr nothing to see here, folks.

  • ddplf@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Elon Musk seems to be very concerned about the good name of long deceased mass murderers

    EDIT: it’s a manipulation. Just go to grok.com and ask him yourselves. I asked him and he confirmed that the holocaust did happen.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      An AI system that can be manipulated to spew holocaust denial rhetoric without a clear indicator in the response that it is misinformation is defective and unacceptable.

      Grok isn’t a ‘him’, it is a fucking program.

      • ddplf@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Go ahead and give me a prompt that will yield what you’re talking about. Or we can just go ahead an trust some random people from twitter and their trimmed screenshots.

        And ok, fine, ask it, I don’t care about the pronouns of the fucking AI, my point still stands.

        • javasux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          The point isn’t the pronouns, the point is the implicit humanization.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Are you saying it is a manipulated prompt that caused Grok to return the text out of context or that multiple users all fabricated screenshots of a sequence of holocaust denial talking points as if they were returned by Grok?

          Edit: Also, the screenshots are from May and there is a common trend with AI being changed to avoid reported scenarios without acknowledging that they made a change.

          Now it is obviously set up to manually include refutations of the deniers within the results, which is an obvious attempt to address the type of results returned in the screenshots. So they ‘fixed’ this one specific scenario in a way that strongly supports the screenshots as being real at the time they were taken even if something was snipped out.

          Playing whack a mole with how misinformation is presented is shit design.

    • KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Q: Did the holocaust happen?

      Grok Answer: Yes, the Holocaust happened. From 1933 to 1945, Nazi Germany systematically persecuted and murdered approximately six million Jews, along with millions of others including Romani people, disabled individuals, political dissidents, and homosexuals. This genocide was carried out through concentration camps, gas chambers, mass shootings, and other atrocities. Extensive historical evidence—including survivor testimonies, Nazi documentation, photographs, and physical remnants like concentration camp sites—confirms the scale and horror of these events. Denying or minimizing the Holocaust contradicts well-established facts and is often rooted in anti-Semitic propaganda.

      • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t know where they are from, but in my native language it’s normal to refer to inanimate objects as “him/his” and it’s a very common mistake when speaking English.

  • SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Does it have sources to back up its’ claims?

    Edit: not a nazi sympathizer or anything, just an honest question about historical sources

  • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    What was the initial prompt?

    Edit: Well I guess, we’re not getting the prompt because then somone could verify truthfulness of the post