If you’re not into a book it is not some great personal failure to stop reading it. People put reading books on too high of a pedestal, it’s just like any other form of entertainment media and if you aren’t jiving with it you can just go do something else.

I was basically hooked from the start. Probably just a personal preference thing, I wouldn’t worry too much about it. I still haven’t been able to read through any of The Lord of the Rings, and yet see my first sentence, lol.

I was pretty hooked from the start. My imagination really took off with it picturing all the tech.

I also enjoy the cyberpunk genre, so I’m sure it helps.

It may also be my ADHD that the jumping around really just vibed with me.

Just accept that it’s wiggy at first. You’re being dragged along on a very high level heist with experienced professionals in their field, and your primary pov is a drug-addled hacker who struggles to differentiate meatspace from cyberspace. They’re not going to stop and explain anything, but you’ll understand the vibes.

If you’re still hot for it afterwards, give it another read. A lot more makes sense once you have an understanding of the bigger picture.

If you don’t like it you don’t like it. Tens of thousands of books out there, don’t feel obligated to read them all.

Too lazy to dig up the source, but I remember that Gibson said something to the effect of emulating the experience of him hanging around a group of hackers irl just listening in, not having background/context, but just allowing meaning to slowly come together as an outsider.

The worlds he built do not spoon feed anything to the observer. Even the characters often have to figure out what just happened after the fact; that’s how quickly technologies and people move there.

Second read through was even more rewarding than the first, if you have the time it will not disappoint.

I’ve failed to finish reading Neuromancer, twice. I got 2/3 of the way through it, both times, and just bailed.

It’s not for everyone.

Embrace it. The chaos is part the cyberpunk form.

It’s not written like typical sci-fi, it’s more like an art house (for lack of a better term) novel that happens to have a sci-fi setting. William Burroughs was a major influence on his writing and Neuromancer is perhaps the most obvious example of that.

It rewards re-reading immensely, I would advise to just go with the flow and don’t sweat the bits you can’t quite grasp, a lot of it makes more sense over time or clicks when you re-read it. It is incredibly worth it, imo, an absolute masterpiece of literary talent and prescient speculative fiction.

Having said that, if that style isn’t really your thing and you prefer more straight-forward sci-fi, then you will probably not dig it.

edit: After posting this comment I re-loaded my feed and there’s a post about William Burroughs directly above this one. Bill would be pleased.

You’re supposed to feel disoriented. Gibson is trying to capture a sense of a future that is accellerating to the point where humans can no longer exist there as we are.

The terminology is supposed to feel bewildering. Don’t sweat it. You’ll piece things together through context.

Stick with it. It’s the kind of book that is capable of completely rewiring your brain. An absolute masterpiece.

With all that being said, maybe try reading the short story Johnny Mnemonic first? That functions as an introduction to the setting and might be a more approachable way to ease yourself into his style. Fewer characters, a smaller, more compact scenario.

My advice is to download a Neuromancer glossary from the internet and have it handy for whenever you encounter a strange word.

For me it was “trodes”. Trodes = electrodes, they allow your mind to plug into cyberspace (a futuristic version of the internet). Also, a deck, or cyberdeck, is basically a laptop without screen made to connect to Cyberspace - we have trodes now.

Take it easy, go with the flow, and play some Techno music in the background to adjust the mood 😎

I’d also recommend listening to the BBC radio play instead of trying to read the thing, it’s pretty cool.

https://youtu.be/S89BHnaxULo

Oh I agree. It’s not an easy read at all. Took me for sure three times longer to finish Neuromancer than a another similarly long sci-fi book.
Language without explanation and a plot that you view from a frog perspective is really confusing.

I can’t say it’s a master piece but I enjoyed it for it’s uniqueness and would probably read it again …sometime in a decade or so.

Currently trying to read through Count Zero, but boy is it hard. Mostly because I don’t feel for any of the characters.

Yeah its on another level. I think the disorientation is deliberate, to give a sense of immersion in a confusing and complex future world. Another book like that is Clockwork Orange.

If you’re really not enjoying it, maybe come back in a few years and give it another go, or try another of Gibson’s books. They aren’t all as tricky as this one. That said I do like this one and it kind of blew my mind when I first read it back in the 80s. I reread it recently and I think picked up on a lot more of the actual plot this time.

First of all: you don’t have to like it.

I agree with you that the first chapters are confusing and overwhelming, but as others have already said this is deliberate. The storylines converge later on which makes it easier to follow what’s happening. In my experience the book handles it very well to balance its sci-fi themes with a compelling story you want to follow.

Wait until the next book in the series. There’s a part in there that I was hella confused about until like 2 chapters later when they explain what happened, because the character whose eyes you’re seeing the story through also has no fucking idea what happened. Don’t wanna spoil it by saying what it was though.