• Crow_Thief@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Tbh, building a mountain and tearing it down again would be about as useful as half of existing jobs.

  • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Assuming the river would be identical in depth and breadth to the Panama canal, if every man, woman, and child in the US picked up a shovel they would need to move 305 cubic feet of dirt each. So if we all just moved 1 cubic foot of dirt per day, we could pull this off in a year.

    • DeanFogg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hey, you’re a numbers guy right? What’s to say we take all that extra dirt and make an island? Asking for a friend

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Does the USA still own the Panama Canal? I remember there being some disputes about that.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I would need a study on if this would negatively impact desert ecosystems or introduce invasive species, but otherwise it sounds pretty cool if we limit the size until it’s about as big as the new Panama Canal expansions.

    • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nevermind any communities you’d separate or destroy by dropping a big ol’ river through the middle of them

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not like the number of communities measuring a hundred miles wide are many. Also, believe it or not, the USA has bridge building technology. Shocking, I know.

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Luckily this entire swath of land is completely void of human and animal life and nobody will be emminent-domained out of their homes and livelihoods with little to no reward for doing so, and bridges are notoriously so much more permeable than plain flat land. I’m such a silly goose to not have thought of those things when I wrote that very serious comment about this very serious hypothetical 🥸