• Moops@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because not everyone has had the experiences and education we have. Perhaps we should take the opportunity to educate rather than to shame.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      106
      ·
      2 months ago

      They said, while blatantly highroading

      Fine though, your point stands. I’m not here to bicker, it just seems like the subtlety here is not exactly asking much sensitivity from its audience

      • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not here to bicker

        You came out fucking swinging. There’s no need to act like you weren’t looking for some kind of confrontation.

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          61
          ·
          2 months ago

          Chalk it up to cultural differences. I’ve explained myself elsewhere in this thread to the best of my ability, if unlikeability ever deserves to be explained.

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          52
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Okay. I’m confused about why you’re here though. If you’re right, then you’re choosing to talk to an unpleasant person for the sake of arguing, and my thesaurus is accusing you of bickering. If you’re wrong, you’re the “unpleasant person on the internet”. If there is a third option that I have carelessly overlooked, perhaps you will find some delight in putting me to work as the Simplicio in your essay on the arts?

          I thought harder about this than you did, and that’s why I lost. Thanks, !traditional_art@lemmy.world