• assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s close enough to the tracks that it would hurt the hostages, and the wreckage would probably have enough momentum to hit them anyway.

      This is a good analogy actually. Blowing up the train would feel good, but that isn’t going to stop the momentum, and it’s unfortunately virtually impossible to outright stop it’s momentum at this point. All that blowing up the train would accomplish is sending fiery wreckage towards the middle track.

      This is why accelerationism is stupid.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      You’ll have to be more specific about what blowing up the train maps to in real life before I can tell you whether or not doing so would also kill a shit ton of people.

      But to keep it in metaphor, there are also innocent people riding the train and blowing it up would kill them, too.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m with you on what the meme is trying to say, but the bottom track needs to be shown looping around to the Republican track and running over everyone.

    Because that’s where the third track leads.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yep, not voting is unironically pretty much the same as voting for the party you least want in charge.

      Because you’re making it that much more likely.

      Don’t throw away a right that your ancestors fought for, as it may result in future generations no longer having that right.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hitler’s government was a popular government; the vast majority of Germans preferred the rule of gangsters to the effort of thinking and doing for themselves. They abdicated their franchise.

        […]

        The former Berlin businessman I referred to earlier told me that he blamed his own group, people with the time and the money and the opportunity to know better, for what happened to Germany. “We ignored Hitler,” he said. “We considered him an unimportant fellow, not quite a gentleman, not of our own class. We considered it just a little bit vulgar to bother with him, to bother with politics at all.”

        They thought of the government as “They.” The only possible route to a clear conscience in politics is to accept political responsibility, either as an active member of the party in power or as an equally active member of the loyal opposition.

        —Robert A. Heinlein, Take Back Your Government

  • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lol neoliberals are stroking themselves about how clever this is and just out of view there was another choice back in 2020.

    But they like to ignore the fact they voted for a geriatric, procorporate genocide supporting candidates in the 2020 primaries.

    • WinterBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      What kind of argument is this? “People talking about the current election are ignoring an option that hasn’t existed for 4 years” of course they’re not?! It’s not an option any more! The meme perfectly represents the idiocy of anyone trying to take any kind of moral high ground by not voting. America has made its bed, it sucks but no amount of idealism can change the practical options available to you.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I never claimed any kind of moral high ground. You’re inferring that all on your own.

        And I will be voting but I won’t be voting for a strike blocking genocide supporting candidate.

        • WinterBear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It’s funny you pull the whole “ackshually I never said that” but I never accused you of taking the moral high ground. I just said the meme perfectly captures the idiocy of people taking the moral high ground. You lumped yourself in that category.

    • FatCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That ship has sailed now bud. Now its trump or biden and that is what the meme is referring to.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        “It doesn’t matter that we made terrible decisions that got us here you’re now morally obligated to vote for our strike blocking genocide supporting candidate!”

        No. I won’t be voting for Biden, Trump or RFK.

        • FatCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          “We”? I’m not even from USA … And I doubt many Lemmy commenters voted for biden in primaries.

          Put your big boy pants on and stop whining when people point out that you are wrong morally on a given issue.

          Sometimes life isn’t fair 🥲😲

      • ashok36@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Less palestinians will die under Biden. People who says “how could it be any worse?” have a severe lack of imagination and/or historical knowledge.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Less palestinians will die under Biden.

          This claim is absolutely meaningless without evidence and some indication about how the situation resolves.

          There’s a very good chance the moment Biden knows he’s won the election he’ll call you Bibi and go “thanks for your patience. Go nuts.”

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The tracks to the correct path can be built by passing state level electoral reform.

    Abolishing the First Past the Post electoral system would allow voters to support third-party candidates without fearing they’ll spoil the election. This reform would invigorate competition in elections, leading to better-quality candidates for all voters. Moreover, it’s likely to boost voter turnout and civic engagement.

    At the state level, electoral reform is feasible; Alaska and Maine have already enacted such changes, demonstrating its viability.

    Despite this, some Republicans are staunchly defending First Past the Post voting, as seen in Florida’s recent ban on Ranked Choice voting. Fortunately, there are numerous of other alternatives available, ensuring that electoral reform can still progress despite such obstacles.

    So, why do some blue states want to continueusing FPTP voting? Why continue using a voting system favored by Republicans? In states controlled by Democrats, there’s no Republican opposition hindering electoral reform efforts.

    It’s apparent that Democrats acknowledge the flaws of FPTP voting, evident in discussions on social media where many Democrats caution against voting third party. It’s perplexing to recognize these flaws yet fail to take action to address them. Merely lecturing on the shortcomings of FPTP voting without pursuing solutions is insufficient.

    Here are some videos on the topic if you’d like to know more:

    First Past The Post voting

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo

    Other electoral systems to choose from:

    Alternative vote

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y3jE3B8HsE

    Ranked Choice voting

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Z2fRPRkWvY

    Range Voting

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3GFG0sXIig

    Single Transferable Vote

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8XOZJkozfI

    STAR voting

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-mOeUXAkV0

    Mixed Member Proportional representation

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT0I-sdoSXU

    • FatCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Electoral systems is a pretty nerdy topic (despite how important it is for who gets power), so it is not an issue the typical voter cares for. Therefore there is not enough political capital for such large reforms to be taken on by politicians.

      • knexcar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Based on the about of Lemmy comments advocating for it, it seems like the typical voter is pretty passionate about ranked choice voting.

        • FatCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Based on a super niche subset of chronically online youth - this applies to everyone. 🤪

    • neeeeDanke@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you were sitting at the controls that would be an option, but allas we are all just part of those doing a tug of (less or more) war for the switch

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fun fact. You don’t get the bottom track without demanding it. You end up on the middle track if you negotiate on human rights.

    • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yup. You also get the middle track when you show up to the 2020 primaries and think to yourself “I’m gonna vote for a geriatric procorporate establishment white man. This is the best decision for me and everyone else will have to accept it because the alternative is Trump.”

      • FatCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Amusing to see commenters who think Biden primary voters are reading forums on Lemmy and are still venting their grudges 4 years later… 🤣

          • FatCat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Definitely not on one of the most marginal, leftleaning comment boards that is lemmy

              • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Lemmy was literally developed by communists and it feels like every other person here is a socialist.

                I think I’ve only ever seen a few people on here call themselves liberals, and that was in the confused American version of the term, I’ve seen liberal used as an insult infinitely more.

                Supporting Biden or Ukraine or Israel also does not immediately equal Liberalism, and I have no clue why yall have been treating it like it does.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yes, liberals will not call themselves liberals. Much like NIMBYS would never call themselves NIMBYS. Especially ones trying to convince leftists to vote for a procorporate genocide supporting trash of a candidate.

  • SnerkRabbledauber@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If that third track were an option the trolley problem would never have existed. If there really is a third track in the real-life situation, then the trolley problem is not a good analogy of that problem.

    Sadly, in this election there is no third track and we are forced into choosing the lesser of two evils.

    If you want a third track, push for ranked choice voting!

    • HANN@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      There literally is a third option that will be printed on most of not all ballots. Rank choice voting is huge but people should be willing to vote earnestly. Nobody wants to be the one to make the change and wants the world to change first but that’s not how it works.

  • BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Guys, I don’t know what’s going on in the world and their wars. I just want a president who isn’t abhorently evil. Do we have to revolutionize to find that 3rd option orrr?

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I assume your “abhorently evil” comment is based off support of the genocide in Palestine (which is a completely reasonable thing to describe as abhorently evil, I’m just being clear about my premise).

      In which case, sorry, bad news, you can’t have that. Your options this time round are genocide supporter or genocide supporter. Somewhere down the line, years from now, the US electoral system may have been sufficiently reformed to make third parties viable. But this year that’s not going to happen.

      So that decision is completely out of your hands. But here’s what you do get to decide; you can have an outright fascist, leading a party of outright fascists who have openly publicised their plans to turn your country into a fascist theocracy. Or you can have the guys who strengthened workers rights and went after major companies for union busting, hit Microsoft for $20 billion in back taxes, had the FBI raid a major landlord for illegal price hikes, brought antitrust lawsuits against Amazon and several other large tech firms, and secured billions in aid for Ukraine in their fight for their freedom. And that is literally just a tiny sampling of the good things that Biden’s government has done.

      I don’t even see how that’s a choice. One of these two options is clearly and manifestly better than the other, no matter how disgusting it feels. A vote for Biden is not an endorsement of his position on Gaza. It is a tactical choice, nothing more. And if nothing else, its a tactical choice that will prevent the fascists from filling even more seats on the supreme court.

      It sucks, but those are the only options. Sometimes life just be like that.

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think the choice is really: Does America deserve the lesser evil?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      We can have it for the low price of demanding it. Tell the Democrats you won’t vote for Biden if he doesn’t stop supporting the Israeli genocide.

      • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You realize why the Ashley Biden rape showers with grandpa suddenly became nearly mainstream news and will suddenly go away if Biden does what he’s told?

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          If that’s how it is then we’ve already lost. People who would make up stories like that would rather take the mask off and destroy democracy then let us get in their way.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If your point is that the American system is fucked, we all know. We’ve known for decades. We’re trying to fix it, but progress is basically nonexistent, because every politician who is currently elected benefits from our fucked system. Trying to get to a parliamentary system, like most developed real democracies, is almost entirely out of reach. Just getting ranked choice voting is like pulling teeth, and we’ll have to create a brand new party to have politicians free from corporate interests.

      I will have to fight all my life to enact positive change in this country, all because a bunch of rich white assholes who came to power long before I was born have stolen my future from me. Don’t belittle us, mourn for us and never, ever repeat our mistakes.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        We’re trying to fix it

        every politician who is currently elected benefits from our fucked system.

        Wild how electing politicians that benefit from the system hasnt fixed the system yet.

  • PeteBauxigeg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Absolutely insane democrat-mental-gymnastics

    Would they have the US still being a two party race no matter what in 2100? In 2200?

    • FatCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      How is voting for a marginal unknown 3rd candidate going to upend the US electoral system, I’m so curious…

      Instead of dreaming look at the general population. How many people who vote do you think actually care about this. Sure they might not like the politicians but do they actually want to change the system? I don’t think so.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hope this post gets a lot of tankie comments. They’ll be flockin’ to a blockin’

    Heh. See, cause. It rhymes. So.

    The one yesterday had that commenter who was all “what’s this? Oh it took me a second cause I blocked all the tankies” and that’s when I realized I forgot to block lemmy.ml. Now that that’s done, it’s just onsie-twosies. It’s a bright, bright sunshiney day.