This summary was submitted to the subreddit:

From the CNN article -

The man who stole and leaked former President Donald Trump and thousands of others’ tax records has been sentenced to five years in prison.

In October, Charles Littlejohn, 38, pleaded guilty to one count of unauthorized disclosures of income tax returns. According to his plea agreement, he stole Trump’s tax returns along with the tax data of “thousands of the nation’s wealthiest people,” while working for a consulting firm with contracts with the Internal Revenue Service.

Littlejohn leaked the information to two news outlets and deleted the documents from his IRS-assigned laptop before returning it and covered the rest of his digital tracks by deleting places where he initially stored the information.

Judge Ana Reyes highlighted the gravity of the crime, saying multiple times that it amounted to an attack against the US and its legal foundation.

“What you did in attacking the sitting president of the United States was an attack on our constitutional democracy,” Reyes said. “We’re talking about someone who … pulled off the biggest heist in IRS history.”

The judge compared Littlejohn’s actions to those of the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, noting that, “your actions were also a threat to our democracy.”

“It engenders the same fear that January 6 does,” Reyes added.

Prosecutors said Littlejohn went through great lengths to steal the tax records undetected, exploiting system loopholes, downloading data to an Apple iPod and uploading the information on a private website he later deleted.

Reyes was also critical of the Justice Department’s decision to only bring one count against Littlejohn.

“The fact that he did what he did and he’s facing one felony count, I have no words for,” the judge said. Prosecutors argued that the one count covers the multitude of Littlejohn’s thefts and leaks.

“A free press and public engagement with the media are critical to any healthy democracy, but stealing and leaking private, personal tax information strips individuals of the legal protection of their most sensitive data,” prosecutors wrote in a court filing recommending Littlejohn be sentenced to the maximum of five years in prison.

“I acted out of a sincere misguided belief,” Littlejohn said in court Monday, adding that he was serving the country and that people had a right to the tax information.

“We as a country make the best decisions when we are all properly informed,” Littlejohn said.

Littlejohn added that he was “aware of the potential consequences” of his actions and knew he would one day be here, in federal court, facing those consequences.

“My actions undermine the fragile faith,” in government institutions in the US, Littlejohn said.

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If revealing the tax records of a president is equally as much a threat to your democracy as an armed mob storming the capitol, your democracy sucks. Well, either that or the judge is outrageously biased and should be fired immediately. Maybe both.

  • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Does he get extra prison for further exposing the unfairness of the system by being imprisoned for this bullshit?

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      “You being in prison reminds me of the Jan 6 attackers being in prison, so I’ve added a few more years to your sentence.” -This dumb judge’s logic

  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    That judge is acting as if he stole the god damned constitution or something. He didn’t take anything of value, gain any kind of monetary reward, and didn’t do any damage to those he “stole” from.

    This is all information we collectively pay for and should be public. If this is somehow damaging our democracy, to the extent that it’s equivalent to attempting to overthrow Congress… Fucking forbes should be in gitmo for their “richest people” articles.

    The simple fact that they advertise their wealth, while simultaneously screaming treason about their tax records being released tells you all you really need to know about the American tax system. In a fair system we should be able to work out exactly how much tax everyone pays by their net worth, instead someone’s going to jail for lifting a corner of the veil that these rich fucks hide behind.

    • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You misunderstand: It is not threatening democracy, it is threatening what is called democracy in the US of A. Like nothing that is called AI is really AI.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    “We’re talking about someone who … pulled off the biggest heist in IRS history.”

    I’d prefer we started talking about the super rich in this context. Plenty of bigger heists than this guy, in my view.

    • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The rich have never been particularly concerned about fascism. They are however, deeply concerned about people knowing their financial details.

  • AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    And Judge Ana Reyes was pissed that 5 years was the maximum sentence permitted under law. But, when you consider that now he’s a felon, that record will be stuck with him long after he is released from prison. But that’s why his appeal is so important. Because if his conviction is overturned, then he doesn’t have a felon record

  • dodgy_bagel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    On the one hand, you have a violent insurrection, some of whom had the intent to assassinate multiple government leaders. On the other hand, a guy uploaded some dude’s tax returns.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Look up the case of Daniel Baker.

      Tweeted that we should defend our country from insurrection on Jan 6. Got nearly 4 years and sentenced by May. Military vet.

      The system moves fast and harshly when it needs or wants to.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Today’s sentence sends a strong message that those who violate laws intended to protect sensitive tax information will face significant punishment.”

    He revealed flaws in the system. He must be punished, lest the plebs find out how badly we’re fucking them.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Judge Ana Reyes needs to have her tax forms routinely shown to the public. If she believes a tax form should hold a secret, that means a secret line of finances and she believes in different rules for different types of people.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      name and shame 👇

      Also she’s apparently Ana Reyes confirmed as first LGBTQ federal judge in D.C..

      Besides this work, for more than a decade Ana has devoted significant time to her pro bono representations of asylum seekers and refugee organizations, including numerous appellate matters for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and impact litigation for Human Rights First,

      Lmao, somehow I don’t believe this. It’s incredibly ironic that she helped people fearing bad government and now she is protecting bad government. What a dunce.

      Also she was nominated by Biden which is the most perplexing fact:

      Reyes’ Senate confirmation came nine months after Biden submitted her nomination in May 2022.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Biden is not on your side. He’s not on the evil side, so we should support him, but the enemy of your enemy is only your friend in battle.

        Also being LGBTQ+ doesn’t make her reasonable or rational.

        Any ambitious lawyer works on pro-bono cases for exposure and experience. I have no doubt she sincerely supports asylum seekers and refugee organizations, as she could have volunteered her services anywhere. Being on the right side of one issue doesn’t make her right about other issues.

        We don’t have to guess where Ana Reyes stands, because she put her thoughts into words, her words into judgement, and we can see her judgement is fundamentally skewed away from justice.