I think for me it’s alien: covenant. I was really interested in the ideas explored in prometheus and covenant just expanded on them. I don’t get much into the details of why it is or isn’t a good movie.

Luckily, though, HBO ran raised by wolves which really delved into ideals about AI and planet seeding etc. So that itch got way scratched even if the run was cut short.

  • Donebrach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    not really sure how people view it (or even how i’d view it now nearly 30 years on) but i liked that weird Final Fantasy: Spirits Within movie when it came out. haven’t seen it since it was in theatres though so not sure what i’d think of it now; i just thought it was neat at the time (and age of 10)

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Dirty Grandpa.

    It’s much funnier than it has a right to be. Also, Aubrey Plaza really, really wanted to fuck Robert De Niro, and fought to get the role for that reason. Its ending sex scene is one of the most genuine in Hollywood because of that. Of course, Aubrey Plaza makes things better just by showing up.

    Critics who hate it need to lighten up.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        That’s one where I really think they missed the mark compared to the book. I thought the book was really well done, and had a great premise. Idk the movie just left a sour taste in my mouth. I highly recommend reading/listening to the book

        • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I saw somewhere on reddit recently calling the book worse than the movie. I liked the book only because I got to envision my version of all the nostalgic iconography. I’m not sure why reddit was hating.

        • jaycifer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’m glad that you enjoyed it, but listening to the audiobook was one of the most aggravating reading experiences I’ve had. There were cool bits, but every chapter or two my eyes would glaze over for a minute as Wil Wheaton read off a list of things from the 80’s for a paragraph or two, interrupting whatever flow the book had going on at the time to cram ‘memberberries down my throat. I prefer the movie because I can look at the ‘memberberry references without them interrupting the other cool bits.

      • chtk@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        I like the movie where the person go into the computer :)

        Even Lawnmower Man 2: Beyond Cyberspace?

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Lol, I really like premise too. It can be done better, tho.

        That’s why I support all sorts of sci-fi that is complete garbage. I want the genre to thrive and if we stop showing up Hollywood stops giving money.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s a work of art.

      A simple tropey story to hang some amazing visual and aural art off.

      I watch it often.

    • x4740N@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’ve watched it when I was younger a couple of times but for me personally it was just a movie I watched amd the idea of rewatching it feels boring to me

  • Iapar@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Last action hero. I think the people don’t understand that the film does it all on purpose.

    It is a love letter to action movies while acknowledging that those are stupid.

    • dethedrus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s a fantastic movie that was just a bit late for the spoof movies of the late 70s/80s and too soon for the torrent of them in the 2000s.

      ‘I am the famous comedian Arnold Braunschweiger’ is not only something I say to my wife without context but also makes me laugh uproariously.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t know how people couldn’t understand it was poking fun at all the ‘80s action heroes, especially Schwarzenegger himself. It’s a fun movie.

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      One could argue it is a demonstrative of every 80’s action movie trope, then going straight into the 90’s tropes list, and it does so with a smile.

    • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Watched it not long ago. Didn’t realize the people rating it have no appreciation for decent movies.

      It wasn’t phenomenal by any means but it was quite entertaining for the duration of it.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      I still think League of Extraordinary Gentlemen got unfairly dragged. 16% on Rotten Tomatoes.

      It is a pretty mediocre movie overall, but it is just a lot of fun and I have watched it a dozen times.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Surprised it hasn’t come back as a streaming channel series of films like “Knives Out”. It’s got a lot of potential.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      I remember screening league of extraordinary gentleman and all I could think is it was probably not for me. Not to say someone else wouldn’t like it. I feel like not everything should be rated based on its wide spread appeal.

    • otto@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t disagree that it’s a terrible movie, it’s just a terrible movie that I happened to really like.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      16% on Rotten Tomatoes.

      That crictic rating though, that’s a useless measure. And 44% audience score isn’t that bad.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Ebert’s big beef with it was “You can’t drive a car in Venice!” and I’m like “You’re OK with 1800s nuclear submarines, an immortal vampire victim, an invisible man, and a dude who can’t be hurt because his painting takes the damage for him, but driving a car in Venice is a bridge too far?”

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

      pretty sure I watched it in the theater while it was new and I didn’t think it was a waste of time but it is forgettable. It’s only really remarkable thing is being Sean Connery’s last movie

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Breakfast of Champions - I don’t care if it totally bastardized Vonnegut, I really liked it.

    Mystery Men - Again, I don’t care if it totally bastardized Bob Burden.

    Titan AE

    The female version of Ghostbusters.

    Zardoz.

    Hackers. Fuck you if you say one bad thing about this movie. It is glorious.

  • Odo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Kung Pow: Enter the Fist. Yes it’s utterly ridiculous. I don’t care, it’s still a masterpiece of absurdity to me. That 13% on RT is a shame.

    Also how has it been 23 years since its release.

  • serfraser@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Well it’s not a shit rating but I do think A Knight’s Tale is way better than its mediocre scores. Perfect comfort movie.

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      ‘but it’s not historically accurate!’

      Y’get to see heath ledger in armor win the girl, bust heads, and have a grand time doing it! All to a solid soundtrack.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 days ago

        The lack of historical accuracy also isn’t due to a lack of research, but a deliberate style and tone choice, as demonstrated at the very beginning of the movie when the trumpeters play We Will Rock You and the crowd claps and stomps along.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Tell me about it. Anybody who saw the first few minutes of the film and still expected the rest to be historicaly accurate should probably get tested for autism. The director made it clear from the very start that A Knight’s Tale is satire.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Really, cool. I’ll have to watch it one of these days, if it ever comes up on streaming

  • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    Waterworld. I love that movie so much. I’ve watched the theatrical, TV, and Ulysses cuts. I’ve read the comics. I’ve played the games. I bought it on Blu-ray the day Arrow released it.

  • FarrahDeadwiley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Bladerunner 2049.

    I know a lot of people disliked it compared to the first one, even Ridley Scott himself. But I love the direction Denis Villeneuve took this film in.

    • throbbing_banjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 days ago

      Did people dislike it compared to the first one? It’s got an 88% on rotten tomatoes, and anyone I’ve talked with about the films prefers the second one.

      I agree with you, by the way, I just don’t think that’s the unpopular take (Ridley’s opinion is meaningless at this point).

    • Artyom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Ridley Scott is famous for his shit opinions. When he released The Last Duel in the middle of COVID, he complained that “them kids can’t even get off their phone for 2 hours to enjoy art” as thr primary reason it wasn’t making money.

    • One of the few sequels that did credit to the original. Like the original Alien trilogy, it’s best if you consider them movies in the same universe but different genres. Like, Aliens (I) was a suspense; II was a sci-fi action; III was a horror thriller.

      Maybe the Blade Runners weren’t so very different in genre, but yeah - good sequel, and in its way faithful to the original.